Search Results for "cement manufacturer"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Modvat Credit Dispute — Capital Goods Credit Denial Set Aside. Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 interpreted to allow credit on capital goods used in manufacture of final products, even if not directly used in the manufacturing process.

The appellant, M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of various chemical products at its Hazira Manufacturing Complex. The comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows CENVAT Credit on GTA Service for Cement Manufacturer — Place of Removal Includes Buyer's Destination. Interpretation of 'Place of Removal' under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for outward transportation of goods sold on FOR destination basis.

The appellant, M/s. Madras Cements Limited, a manufacturer of cement, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sales Tax Reference by Dealer in Setoff Disallowance Case. Rule 41D of Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 restricts setoff to raw materials and consumable stores, not capital assets like scientific equipment used for research and development.

The case is a sales tax reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from an order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Stabilisation of Crude Oil Not 'Manufacture' Under Central Excise Act, 1944. The process of stabilising crude oil on process platforms does not amount to manufacture and stabilised crude oil is not excisable goods.

The appellant, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), operates oil wells and process platforms in Mumbai Offshore. The extracted gas-oil mix ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case. 'ULTRATUFF' Held Deceptively Similar to 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The respondent-plaintiff, Ultratech Cement Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the appellants-defendants, Alaknan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Favor of Dealer in Sales Tax Case Regarding Packing Materials Used in Exports. Purchase Tax Not Leviable on Packing Materials Sold Along with Exported Goods Under Section 14 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The case involves a reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra Sta...