Search Results for "audit under GST"

46 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses RTI Petition Seeking GST Returns of Third Parties — Information Held Confidential Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005. Disclosure of commercial tax returns of six firms denied as personal information not related to any public activity.

The petitioner, Adarsh S/o Gautam Pimpare, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Show Cause Notice in GST Case Based on CERA Audit Report. Court Holds That CAG Audit of Government Departments Does Not Extend to Private Companies, But Show Cause Notice Issued by Department After Independent Application of Mind Is Not Vitiated.

The petitioner, Vertiv Energy Pvt. Ltd., a private company, challenged a show cause notice dated 7 December 2023 issued under the Central Goods and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to GST Notification Extending Time Limit for Show Cause Notice. Notification No. 09/2023 held valid under Section 168A of CGST Act, 2017 as a legislative act not amenable to certiorari.

The petitioner, M/s Sahaj Construction, a registered dealer under the GST laws, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention of Goods Under GST for Lack of Jurisdiction — Second Detention Without Proper Authorization Invalid. The court held that detention of goods under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 requires proper authorization and cannot be done without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...