Search Results for "Village Panchayath resolution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Village Panchayath resolution"

22 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Removal of Gram Panchayat Members for Violation of Natural Justice. Section 49 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Requires Show Cause Notice Before Removal.

8 Dec 2020

The petitioners, former President and Vice-President of Chandavar Gram Panchayat and former President of Valgalli Gram Panchayat, challenged the order...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of No-Confidence Motion Rules Under Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act, 1993. Rule 3(1), 3(2), and 3(4) of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayath) Rules, 1994 held intra vires the parent Act.

19 Dec 2019

The petitioner, B.R. Siddaramu, was the Upadhyaksha (Vice President) of Gollahalli Grama Panchayat. He was aggrieved by a notice dated 26.08.2019 issu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Vice President — Motion Valid Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Notice of Motion Properly Served and Motion Carried by Majority of Members.

26 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Sri R. Chandrahasa, a member of Kesturu Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengi...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against President and Vice President of Village Panchayat — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 49(2) was not complied with as the meeting was held only 4 days after the notice.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Panchayat President and Vice President — Requirement of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Held Directory. Motion Valid as Substantially Complied With.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion and resolution invalid.

12 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Sri Harisha I.E., was the President of Ichanahally Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against him by the respondents, wh...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Gram Panchayat President Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Motion signed by only 9 members instead of the required 10, and notice period of 15 days not provided.

28 Sep 2018

The petitioner, Smt. Roopa, was the President of Honnenahalli Gram Panchayat. The respondents 5 to 14, who were members of the Panchayat, moved a no-c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Village Panchayath Resolution and Taluk Panchayath Approval for Lack of Notice to Petitioner. Resolution passed without notice to the petitioner, who is the owner of the property, violates principles of natural justice under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Sri Malledevirappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a resolution dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Village Panchayath Resolution and Taluk Panchayath Approval for Lack of Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Resolution passed without notice to petitioner and without considering his objections, violating principles of natural justice under the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

2 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Sri Malledevirappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to quas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions by Non-Members Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Members — Petitioners Lack Locus Standi. No-Confidence Motion Validly Passed Under Section 49 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

19 Jan 2016

The petitioners, who are residents and social workers of Ujani village, filed writ petitions challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the m...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)