Search Results for "Section 22-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Section 22-A"

94 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer of Gairan Land for Housing Scheme - Transfer Upheld as Legal Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for Public Purpose with Rehabilitation Safeguards. The court found that the Collector's order complied with Section 22A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and other statutory provisions, ensuring no displacement without lawful rehabilitation for existing inhabitants.

10 Mar 2026

The petitioners, residents of Rohkal village, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 01/06/2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Forest Land Encroachment Notices Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and Forest Act. Petitioners Failed to Establish Title or Authorisation for Construction on Government Forest Land.

24 Dec 2025

The petitioners, nine individuals, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging notices issued by the Deputy Conservator of Forests ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Service Tax on Airport Development Fee Case. User Development Fee Collected by Airport Operators Under Statutory Authority is Not Subject to Service Tax Under Finance Act, 1994.

19 May 2023

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the revenue against CESTAT orders that had held user development fee collected by airport operators not liable...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process in NI Act Complaint Due to Bar Under SICA Section 22A. Proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot continue against a sick company without BIFR consent.

9 Jul 2019

The petitioners, a company and its directors, challenged the order dated 20.04.2018 passed by the 25th Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Department's Notice on Private Forest Land. Held that lands restored under Section 22A of Maharashtra Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1975 retain status of reserved forest under Indian Forest Act, 1927.

3 Feb 2015

The Petitioner, Sinhagad Technical Education Society, claimed ownership of lands bearing Gat Nos. 310 and 311 at village Kusgaon Budruk, Taluka Maval,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Role in Day-to-Day Affairs. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Averments of Their Involvement in Company's Business.

5 Sep 2014

The petitioners, including a company and its directors, challenged the order issuing process under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Discharge of Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Despite BIFR Proceedings. The court held that an order under Section 22 of SICA does not automatically bar criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

9 Apr 2013

The petitioner, Harshad Jayprasad Bakshi, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the order of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 12th Court, Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

29 Jul 2011

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Change of Land Reservation from Parking to Bus Terminus in Pune — Violation of Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Change of reservation without following mandatory procedure under Section 37 of the MRTP Act, 1966 is illegal and unsustainable.

3 May 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by landowners in Pune challenging the change of reservation of their land from parking to a bus terminu...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)