Search Results for "Section 127C"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission's Majority Decision Rejecting Settlement Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case. Majority view prevails over minority view under Section 127I of the Customs Act, 1962 when there is a difference of opinion among Members.

The petitioners, Under Water Services Company Limited and others, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Customs Duty Settlement Case — Upholds Settlement Commission's Rejection for Non-Disclosure. Settlement Commission's Finding of Non-Disclosure of Full Facts Under Section 127C of Customs Act, 1962 Not Interfered With as Not Perverse.

The appellants, including M/s C S India and its partners, filed a writ appeal before the Karnataka High Court challenging the order of a learned Singl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Customs to Refund Sale Proceeds with Interest Following Settlement Commission Order. Failure to Implement Settlement Order Within Reasonable Time Amounts to Unjust Enrichment and Arbitrary Action Under Article 226.

The Petitioner, Vishnu M. Harlalka, approached the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking implementation of an order dated 9 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission Order Allowing Exemption for Imported Ferrari Despite Temporary UK Registration. Temporary registration for transit purposes does not disqualify a vehicle from exemption under Notification 21/2002-CUS as 'new, not registered anywhere prior to importation'.

The case involves a challenge by the Commissioner of Customs (Import) against an order of the Settlement Commission under Section 127C(5) of the Custo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case. Settlement Commission's order upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962 granting immunity from interest.

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Central Excise Duty Evasion Case. Petitioner, a 100% EOU, cleared goods to DTA without permission and duty payment, leading to demand of Rs. 33,96,718/-.

The petitioner, M/s. Viva Herba Pvt. Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in manufacturing vegetable extracts, filed a writ petition under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Orders in Customs Duty Under-Invoicing Case. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Settlement Application Upheld as Proper Exercise of Discretion Under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, M/s Paul Industries, imported electronic goods during 1995-96 and was issued a show cause notice on 11th June 1999 by the Directorate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Rejecting Premature Application in Fraudulent Export Case. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Application as Premature Upheld as No Show Cause Notice Issued Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioners, M/s Petrosolv India Co. and its partner, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13 July 2006 passed by the Settlement Commi...