Search Results for "Section 11-A Industrial Disputes Act"

93 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Employees of National Textile Corporation Ltd. — Petitioners Not Employees of NTC Ltd. as They Were Appointed by Contractors and No Employer-Employee Relationship Established.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shilpa S. Chandankar and Priyanka Pradeep Chavan against the National Textile Corporation Ltd. (NTC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Interim Relief Against Dismissal in Misappropriation Case. Labour Court and Industrial Court Correctly Refused to Restrain Employer from Issuing Punishment Order at Second Show Cause Stage Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Dhanraj Gaikwad, was employed as a clerk with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 2008. He was charge-sheet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal in Industrial Dispute — Scope of Enquiry Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Clarified. Labour Court's Order Rejecting Approval for Dismissal Restored as It Did Not Exceed Its Limited Jurisdiction.

The appeal arose from a dispute between John D'Souza, a workman, and the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). The workman joined as a b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.

The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Against Subsistence Allowance Order in De Novo Enquiry. Employee dismissed after departmental enquiry is entitled to subsistence allowance during de novo proceedings before Labour Court under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioner, Mumbai Cricket Association, challenged an order of the 12th Labour Court, Bombay, dated 15th October 2010, which directed the payment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Corporation's Challenge to Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

This batch of writ petitions arises from a common dispute between the Maharashtra State Handloom Corporation (the Corporation) and its employees. The ...