Search Results for "Scheduled Tribe Order 1976"

234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Requirement of Proof of Migration from Specified Areas for Thakur Scheduled Tribe Status. Scrutiny Committee's Rejection Based on Non-Migration from Earlier Specified Areas Challenged.

The matter arose from two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging orders of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Scrutiny Committee Orders Invalidating Thakur Scheduled Tribe Claims. Removal of Area Restriction by Act 108 of 1976 and Prior Validity Certificates of Relatives Render Rejection Orders Unsustainable.

The petitioners filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging orders of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Invalidated Tribe Claim for Thakar Scheduled Tribe. Scrutiny Committee's order set aside for ignoring settled legal principles and Division Bench directions in Madhuri Nitin Jadhav case.

The petitioner, Abhimanyu Dattu Thakar, was issued a caste certificate on 22 June 1981 and appointed as a peon in the office of respondent No.3, Execu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Cancelling Scheduled Tribe Certificate for Violation of Natural Justice. Minor Variation in Caste Name 'Mahadev Koli' Instead of 'Koli Mahadev' Held Not Fatal Under the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.

The petitioner, Dattatraya Rajendra Pandhare, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30 April 2014 passed by the Scheduled Tribe, Caste Cer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Thakur Scheduled Tribe Claim Due to Non-Consideration of Evidence. Petitioner's Caste Claim Remanded for Fresh Consideration with Opportunity to Produce Documents.

The petitioner, Jitendra Bhalchandra Salunke, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.07.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Rejection of Halba Scheduled Tribe Claim. Court Holds That Documentary Evidence from 1923 Prevails Over Anthropological Texts, and Halba and Halbi Are the Same Tribe Under Entry 19 of the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.

The petitioner, Sanjay s/o Rama Nandanwar, challenged the order dated 31 July 2013 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amrav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Rejection of Thakur Tribe Claim. Court upholds committee's finding that petitioner failed to prove he belongs to Thakur Scheduled Tribe due to lack of documentary evidence and contradictory entries.

The petitioner, Rajendra Ramrao Ghosalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated May 19, 200...