Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Invalidity of Scheduled Tribe Certificate for 'Thakur' Community. Court holds that the Scrutiny Committee's order was perverse and based on non-application of mind, and that the petitioner's documents including school leaving certificate and government gazette notification were sufficient to establish her tribe claim.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Jayshree Suryawanshi, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in a Zilla Parishad school against a Scheduled Tribe reserved category post. Her tribe claim was referred to the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Konkan Division, Thane. She submitted 38 documents including a school leaving certificate showing her caste as 'Thakur' and a government gazette notification dated 04.11.1999. The committee invalidated her claim. The petitioner challenged this order by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The High Court found that the committee's order was perverse and based on non-application of mind, as it ignored relevant documents. The court allowed the petition, quashed the committee's order, and directed the committee to issue a validity certificate to the petitioner within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Scheduled Tribe Certificate - Scrutiny Committee - Perverse Order - The Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim was held to be perverse and based on non-application of mind, as the committee ignored relevant documents including the school leaving certificate and government gazette notification showing 'Thakur' as a Scheduled Tribe. (Paras 1-10)

B) Evidence - Sufficiency of Documents - The petitioner had submitted 38 documents including school leaving certificate and government gazette notification dated 04.11.1999, which were sufficient to establish her claim. The committee's rejection was arbitrary. (Paras 2-5)

C) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ Jurisdiction - The High Court exercised its writ jurisdiction to quash the committee's order and direct issuance of a validity certificate, as the committee's decision was unsustainable. (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's claim of belonging to 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, and directed the committee to issue a validity certificate to the petitioner within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Scheduled Tribe Certificate
  • Scrutiny Committee
  • Perverse Order
  • Non-application of mind
  • Sufficiency of evidence
  • Government Gazette notification
  • School leaving certificate
  • Caste validity
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (01) 38

WRIT PETITION NO. 2230 OF 2013

2021-01-08

R. D. Dhanuka, Madhav J. Jamdar

2021:BHC-AS:161-DB

Mr. Madhav Golegaonkar a/w. Mr. A. S. Golegaonkar for the Petitioner, Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl. G. P. a/w. Mr. K. S. Thorat, AGP and Ms. Geeta Sonawane, AGP for the Respondent-State

Smt. Jayshree d/o Subhash Suryawanshi @ Smt. Jayshree w/o Nitin Thakur

The State of Maharashtra, The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Konkan Division, The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev), Dahanu Division, The Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad, Thane, The Education Officer (Primary) Zilla Parishad, Thane, The Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Palghar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner seeks a declaration that she belongs to 'Thakur-Scheduled Tribe' and quashing of the committee's order.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's claim of belonging to 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe was invalidated by the Scrutiny Committee despite submission of 38 documents including school leaving certificate and government gazette notification.

Previous Decisions

The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Konkan Division, Thane passed an order invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim.

Issues

Whether the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's claim of belonging to 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner submitted that she had submitted sufficient documents including school leaving certificate and government gazette notification showing her caste as 'Thakur'. The respondent-State argued in support of the committee's order.

Ratio Decidendi

The Scrutiny Committee's order was perverse and based on non-application of mind, as it ignored relevant documents such as the school leaving certificate and government gazette notification. The petitioner's documents were sufficient to establish her tribe claim.

Judgment Excerpts

By this Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has impugned the decision and order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Konkan Division, Thane-Respondent No.2 herein invalidating the claim of the Petitioner... The Petitioner submitted 38 documents before Respondent No.2-Committee in support of her Tribe Claim. It is the case of the Petitioner that the Petitioner had submitted School Leaving Certificate issued by the Principal, Savitribai Fule Adhyapak Vidyalaya, Kinhwali showing her caste recorded as 'Thakur'. The Petitioner also submitted Government Gazette dated 04.11.1999 showing...

Procedural History

The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher on 21.03.2000 against a Scheduled Tribe reserved category post. Her tribe claim was referred to the Scrutiny Committee on 21.01.2011. The committee invalidated her claim. The petitioner filed the present writ petition on an unspecified date.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim - Deceased Labourer's Income Assessed at Rs.4,500 per Month with Future Prospects. Negligence of Trailer Driver and Owner Established, Insurance Company Liable to Pay E...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition to Implead Daughter in Final Decree Proceedings Under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC — Amendment to Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Confers Coparcenary Rights on Daughters Born Before 2005