Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Thakur Scheduled Tribe Claim Due to Non-Consideration of Evidence. Petitioner's Caste Claim Remanded for Fresh Consideration with Opportunity to Produce Documents.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Jitendra Bhalchandra Salunke, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.07.2012 passed by the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims, Nandurbar (Respondent No.2). The petitioner claimed to belong to the 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe, which is a notified and recognized Scheduled Tribe. He had obtained a caste certificate from the Sub Divisional Officer, Shirpur (Respondent No.3), and had submitted various documents in support of his claim, including an affidavit of his paternal uncle. However, the Scrutiny Committee invalidated his tribe claim, leading to the present petition. The petitioner argued that the committee did not consider the documents and affidavits he had submitted, and that the order was passed without proper application of mind. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the Scrutiny Committee, opposed the petition. The court, after hearing the parties, found that the committee had indeed failed to consider the relevant documents, including the caste certificate and the affidavit of the paternal uncle. The court noted that the committee's order was unsustainable and that the matter required fresh consideration. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Scrutiny Committee for fresh decision, directing the committee to consider all documents already on record and to give the petitioner an opportunity to produce additional documents. The court also directed that the petitioner's caste certificate and other benefits shall not be disturbed until the committee decides the matter afresh. The petition was allowed, and the rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Challenge to Scrutiny Committee Order - The petitioner challenged the order dated 30.07.2012 passed by the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims, Nandurbar, which invalidated his claim to belong to 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe. The court found that the committee did not consider the documents and affidavits submitted by the petitioner, including a caste certificate issued by the Sub Divisional Officer, Shirpur, and an affidavit of the paternal uncle. The court held that the committee's order was unsustainable and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. (Paras 1-10)

B) Service Law - Caste Claim - Scheduled Tribe - Validity Certificate - The petitioner had obtained a caste certificate from the Sub Divisional Officer, Shirpur, and had submitted an affidavit of his paternal uncle and other documents. The Scrutiny Committee rejected the claim without considering these documents. The court held that the committee must consider all relevant evidence and provide an opportunity to the petitioner to produce additional documents. (Paras 6-10)

C) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Opportunity of Hearing - The court observed that the Scrutiny Committee did not give the petitioner a fair opportunity to present his case, as it failed to consider the documents already on record. The court directed the committee to decide the matter afresh after giving the petitioner an opportunity to produce further evidence. (Paras 9-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of the Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim as 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe is sustainable when the committee failed to consider relevant documents and affidavits submitted by the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order dated 30.07.2012 passed by the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims, Nandurbar, and remanded the matter to the committee for fresh consideration. The committee was directed to consider all documents already on record and to give the petitioner an opportunity to produce additional documents. The petitioner's caste certificate and other benefits shall not be disturbed until the committee decides the matter afresh. Rule is made absolute.

Law Points

  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Scheduled Tribes
  • Scrutiny Committee
  • Validity Certificate
  • Natural Justice
  • Remand
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (06) 65

Writ Petition No. 7534 of 2012

2017-06-20

S.C. Dharmadhikari, Mangesh S. Patil

Shri A.S. Golegaonkar, Shri M.A. Golegaonkar, Shri Koralkar Arun H., Shri P.S. Patil, Shri Yogesh Bolkar, Shri A.B. Girase

Jitendra s/o Bhalchandra Salunke

The State of Maharashtra, The Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims, The Sub Divisional Officer, The North Maharashtra University, The Principal, Adarsh Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, The Deputy Commissioner (Administration), Department of Social Justice and Special Assistance

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's claim to belong to 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought quashing of the order dated 30.07.2012 passed by the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims, Nandurbar, and a direction to the committee to reconsider his tribe claim.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's tribe claim was invalidated by the Scrutiny Committee without considering the documents and affidavits submitted by him.

Previous Decisions

The Scrutiny Committee passed the order dated 30.07.2012 invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition in September 2012, and on 10.09.2012, the court issued notice and directed that no adverse order be passed against the petitioner on account of non-production of validity certificate.

Issues

Whether the Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim is sustainable when it failed to consider relevant documents and affidavits. Whether the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration with an opportunity to the petitioner to produce additional evidence.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the Scrutiny Committee did not consider the documents and affidavits he had submitted, including the caste certificate issued by the Sub Divisional Officer and the affidavit of his paternal uncle. The respondents opposed the petition, but the court found that the committee had indeed failed to consider the relevant evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The Scrutiny Committee must consider all relevant documents and affidavits submitted by the claimant before passing an order invalidating a tribe claim. Failure to do so renders the order unsustainable, and the matter must be remanded for fresh consideration with an opportunity to the claimant to produce additional evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner claims that he belongs to 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe. The First Respondent is the State of Maharashtra through it's Department of Tribal Development and which has set up Respondent No.2 Committee styled as Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims. The Petitioner has submitted an affidavit of his paternal uncle and other documents. The Committee did not consider the documents and affidavits submitted by the Petitioner. We are of the opinion that the impugned order cannot be sustained and the matter requires to be remanded back to the Committee for fresh consideration.

Procedural History

The petitioner obtained a caste certificate from the Sub Divisional Officer, Shirpur. The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the tribe claim by order dated 30.07.2012. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 7534 of 2012 in the Bombay High Court in September 2012. On 10.09.2012, the court issued notice and granted interim protection. The petition was heard and decided on 20.06.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Structures in Mohili Village. Petitioners failed to establish legal right to occupy public land and structures were found to be illegal encroachments under the Maharashtra Re...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Thakur Scheduled Tribe Claim Due to Non-Consideration of Evidence. Petitioner's Caste Claim Remanded for Fresh Consideration with Opportunity to Produce Documents.