Search Results for "Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act 1959"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act 1959"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order on Court Fee Valuation in Suit for Declaration and Mandatory Injunction. Court holds that when a plaintiff seeks declaration that a document is forged and not binding, the relief is not capable of valuation and court fee is payable under Section 24(d) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, not under Section 11(2).

29 Apr 2015

The petitioners, who were plaintiffs in O.S.No.166/2006 before the II Civil Judge at Mysore, filed a suit for declaration that a palupatti dated 8.7.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Taxing Master's Order on Court Fees in Property Suit — Court Fees Must Be Paid on Current Market Value Under Section 5 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959. Plaintiff's Challenge to Order Directing Payment of Court Fees on Current Market Value Dismissed as Consent Decree in Prior Suit Does Not Affect Court Fee Liability in Subsequent Suit.

24 Jul 2013

The plaintiff, Smt. Hema Valecha, filed a Chamber Summons challenging an order dated 2nd May 2011 passed by the learned Taxing Master of the Bombay Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

1 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Partition Suit Valuation Dispute — Court Fee Payable Under Section 6(iv)(d) of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 on Market Value of Plaintiff's Share. Suit for partition and possession of agricultural land valued at Rs.4,60,000/- held to be properly valued under Section 6(iv)(d) and not under Section 6(iv)(ha) of the Act.

29 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Sau. Asha Sopan Maithane, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 02.09.2009 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular Second Appeals and Cross-Objection in Declaration and Injunction Suit. Multiple Heirs Dispute Partition of Suit Schedule Properties, Including Agricultural Land and House.

3 Jul 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit for Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate genuine urgency to bypass mandatory pre-institution mediation, as the suit sought recovery of development management fees and security deposit without any specific instances of imminent threat.

11 Nov 2024

The plaintiff, Ekta Housing Private Limited, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Shraddha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. and two individual guarantors for rec...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Pronounces Judgment on Constitutional Validity of Karnataka Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2023 and Karnataka High Court (Amendment) Act, 2023. The Verdict on the Appeal and Connected Petition Remains Unstated in the Available Excerpt of the Judgment.

8 Jul 2026

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha, heard a writ appeal a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

26 Jul 2018

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Advocate for Sending Complaint to Cooperative Registrar. Communication to Registrar Held Not 'Publication' as It Lacked Intent to Harm Reputation and Was Privileged Under Exception 9 to Section 499 IPC.

2 Feb 2015

The plaintiffs, members of a cooperative housing society, filed a defamation suit against Defendant No.1 (a fellow member) and Defendant No.2 (her adv...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.

22 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)