High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular Second Appeals and Cross-Objection in Declaration and Injunction Suit. Multiple Heirs Dispute Partition of Suit Schedule Properties, Including Agricultural Land and House.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC020091692016_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (07) 81

RSA No. 100389 of 2016 C/W RSA No. 100548 of 2024 and RSA CROB No. 100009 of 2016

2025-07-03

M.G.S. Kamal

Sri. Sourabh S. Sondur for Sri. K.L. Patil and Sri. Vishwanth Hegde; Sri. D. Nagaraj and Sri. Rajashekhar R. Gunjalli

Basavanneppa S/o. Tirakawwa Talawar (since deceased by LRs) and Others

Smt. Anasavva W/o. Hanamanthappa Aladakatti and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for declaration and injunction involving partition of suit schedule properties

Previous Decisions

Original Suit No.5/2000 decided by Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and JMFC, Haveri on 05.01.2010; Regular Appeals R.A.No.13/2010 and R.A.No.10/2010 decided by I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haveri on 28.03.2016

Judgment Excerpts

These appeals and the cross-objection are filed by the both the plaintiff and the defendants in O.S. No.5/2000 against

Procedural History

Original Suit No.5/2000 filed before Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and JMFC, Haveri; judgment and decree dated 05.01.2010. Two regular appeals (R.A.No.13/2010 and R.A.No.10/2010) filed before I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haveri; common judgment dated 28.03.2016. Thereafter, Regular Second Appeals and Cross-Objection filed before High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 100, Order 41 Rule 22
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Identity and Negligence. Concurrent Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Accused Was Driver of KSRTC Bus Involved...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions by Cable TV Operators Challenging Denial of Compounding Option and Imposition of Tax on Monthly Subscriptions. Amendments to Rule 41-G and Section 4D of Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act, 1958, Held Valid and No...