Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 32
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (in liquidation). The plots were A26/3 (64,569.50 sq. mts.) and A/26/2/2 (22,879 sq. mts.) at Butibori Industrial Area, Nagpur. The Official Liquidator sought condonation of delay in filing the report, a declaration that the sale in winding up is a formal transfer not subject to differential premium, and waiver of extension charges under Section 446(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. MIDC opposed, claiming transfer charges and extension fees. The court examined MIDC's transfer policy and circulars, including the circular dated 11th June 2011. The court held that a sale by the Official Liquidator in the course of winding up is a formal transfer by operation of law and not a voluntary transfer, thus not attracting differential premium. The court also exercised its powers under Section 446(2) to waive extension charges, as the winding up process should not be impeded by such levies. The court directed MIDC to disclose the basis for its claim and to file its claim for charges payable upon transfer. The judgment clarifies the interplay between company liquidation and industrial development authority policies.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Winding Up - Sale by Official Liquidator - Transfer Charges - Differential Premium - The sale of plots by Official Liquidator in the course of winding up of the allottee company is a formal transfer under MIDC circulars and not subject to payment of differential premium. The court held that such transfer is akin to a transfer by operation of law and should not attract additional premium. (Paras 1-42)

B) Company Law - Winding Up - Extension Charges - Waiver - Section 446(2) Companies Act, 1956 - The court can exercise powers under Section 446(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 read with MIDC Circular dated 11th June 2011 to waive levy of extension charges claimed by MIDC over the subject property. The court held that the winding up process should not be burdened with such charges. (Paras 1-42)

C) Industrial Law - MIDC - Transfer Policy - Formal Transfer - The transfer of plots by Official Liquidator in liquidation is a formal transfer under MIDC circulars and not a commercial transfer, hence differential premium is not payable. The court directed MIDC to disclose basis for claim of transfer charges. (Paras 1-42)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether sale of industrial plots by Official Liquidator in the course of winding up is a formal transfer under MIDC circulars and not subject to differential premium; whether extension charges can be waived under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the Official Liquidator's Report, holding that the sale in winding up is a formal transfer not subject to differential premium, and waived extension charges under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956. MIDC was directed to disclose basis for its claim and file its claim for charges payable upon transfer.

Law Points

  • Sale by Official Liquidator in winding up is a formal transfer not attracting differential premium
  • MIDC circulars must be read harmoniously with Companies Act
  • Court can waive extension charges under Section 446(2) of Companies Act
  • 1956
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (07) 75

Official Liquidator No.466 of 2016 in Company Petition No.606 of 1998

2018-07-26

K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

Shri Sharan Jagtiani for Official Liquidator, Shri Prashant Chawan a/w. Shri Navdeep Vora I/b. Navdeep Vora and Associates for MIDC, Shri Rohit Gupta a/w. Shri Vinod Kothari and Ms. Gauri Joshi I/b. Apex Law partners for purchaser, Shri Mahendhar Aithe, Company Prosecutor for Official Liquidator present

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Official Liquidator's Report seeking directions regarding sale of industrial plots in winding up proceedings

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay, declaration that sale is formal transfer not subject to differential premium, waiver of extension charges, direction to MIDC to disclose basis for claim

Filing Reason

Dispute over MIDC's claim for differential premium and extension charges on transfer of plots by Official Liquidator

Previous Decisions

Order dated 22nd January 2008 appointing Official Liquidator; order dated 14th January 2016; order dated 1st July 2016

Issues

Whether sale by Official Liquidator in winding up is a formal transfer under MIDC circulars and not subject to differential premium Whether extension charges can be waived under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956

Submissions/Arguments

Official Liquidator argued that sale in winding up is a formal transfer by operation of law and should not attract differential premium or extension charges MIDC opposed, claiming that transfer charges and extension fees are payable as per their policy

Ratio Decidendi

A sale by Official Liquidator in the course of winding up is a formal transfer by operation of law and not a voluntary transfer, hence not subject to differential premium under MIDC circulars. The court has power under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges to facilitate winding up.

Judgment Excerpts

Official Liquidator has placed this Official Liquidator's Report for the following reliefs... The sale or liquidation of the subject property in the course of winding up of the allottee/lessee is a formal transfer under the extant MIDC Circulars and therefore not subject to payment of 'Differential premium'

Procedural History

Company Petition No.606 of 1998 was filed. On 22nd January 2008, Official Liquidator was appointed as Liquidator of Transpower Engineering Ltd. On 14th January 2016, an order was passed regarding charges. On 1st July 2016, an order was passed for revaluation and sale. Official Liquidator filed OLR No.466 of 2016 seeking directions. MIDC was directed to file affidavit. Judgment reserved on 5th July 2018 and pronounced on 26th July 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 1956: 446(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 198...