Search Results for "Heritage area"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Heritage area"

98 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

5 May 2017

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

10 Jan 2023

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Demolition of Commercial Structures in Protected Area of Virupapura Gaddi, Hampi. Constructions in Protected Area Declared Under Mysore Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1961 Are Illegal and Subject to Demolition by Hampi World Heritage Area Management Authority.

11 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by owners of restaurants, guest houses, and other commercial establishments in Virupapura Gaddi, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Development of Textile Mill Lands in Mumbai — Heritage Conservation and Public Interest Claims Rejected as Premature and Without Merit. The court held that no cause of action arises until a final decision is made by the Heritage Conservation Committee or other authorities.

5 May 2006

The Bombay High Court dismissed three notices of motion in a writ petition filed by the Indian National Trust for Art & Cultural Heritage (INTACH) and...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Heritage Market Buildings. Heritage Classification Does Not Bar Demolition for Public Safety Under Section 2(1ea) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961.

8 Aug 2023

The petitioners, residents of Mysuru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

14 Mar 2014

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Chandigarh Administration to Seek UNESCO Approval for High Court Verandah Construction — Heritage Status Concerns Override Immediate Mandamus. The Court directed the Administration to conduct a Heritage Impact Assessment and obtain UNESCO concurrence before constructing a verandah in front of Court Room No.1 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the Chandigarh Administration against orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in a public interest lit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Compliance of Settlement in Contempt Proceedings for Non-Renewal of Licenses - Home Buyers' Interests Paramount. The Court held that the Mittal Group must pay renewal license fee and avail OTS scheme, while the Seth Group must pay its share of EDC and furnish documents, failing which contempt action including attachment and imprisonment would follow.

9 Oct 2020

The dispute in this contempt petition arises from a Memorandum of Settlement (MOS) dated 04.05.2015 between the Seth Group and the Mittal Group, which...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge Order Upholding Endorsement for Unauthorized Construction in Hampi World Heritage Area. Construction of Resort Without Approval from Heritage Authority Violates Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and Hampi World Heritage Area Management Authority Act, 2002.

29 Jun 2020

The appellant, Sri. Lakshmi Golden Beach Resort, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court challenging an e...

High Court

Arbitration Petition Dismissed: No Binding Amendment to Development Agreement Established. Court Holds No Consensus Ad Idem on Essential Terms of Amendment – Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Invoked

4 Mar 2025

Binding Amendment Requires Consensus on Essential Terms: – For a binding amendment to a development agreement, the parties must reach consensus ad...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)