Search Results for "DGGI"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "DGGI"

12 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Summons Issued Without Jurisdiction — Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction Renders Proceedings Void Ab Initio. The court quashed summons under Section 70 of CGST Act, 2017 issued by an officer in Coimbatore to a Nagpur-based company, holding that the officer lacked territorial jurisdiction.

6 May 2026

The petitioner, M/s D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Private Limited, a Nagpur-based company, challenged summons issued by the Senior Intelligence Office...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Commercial Court Order and Restores Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute Over Witness Competence Issue. Commercial Court Erred in Finding Patent Illegality Based on Inadmissibility of Authorized Representative's Evidence Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as Witness Competence Relates to Evidence Appreciation, Not Fundamental Legal Error.

10 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from a Master Service Agreement dated 11.04.2019  where Appellant agreed to provide temporary delivery executives to Swigg...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show-Cause Notice Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — DGGI Officer Not Authorized as Proper Officer. The court held that only officers specifically authorized by the Commissioner can issue notices under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the DGGI officer lacked such authorization.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s NCS Pearson Inc., a Minnesota-based corporation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India bef...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 in Assam Accord Challenge — Majority Holds Cut-off Date of 25.03.1971 for Regularisation of Immigrants Valid. The court held that the provision is a reasonable classification under Article 14 and does not violate Articles 6, 7, 29, 325, 326, 355, 356, or 368 of the Constitution.

17 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions and appeals, considered the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arrest and Remand in GST Case for Non-Compliance with Section 35(3) BNSS Notice Requirement. Failure to Issue Mandatory Notice Under Section 35(3) BNSS Before Arrest Renders Arrest Illegal and Proceedings Vitiated Under Section 69(1) Read with Sections 132(1)(a), 132(1)(b), 132(1)(i) and 132(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

12 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Viral Narendra Gosalia, a proprietor, was arrested by the Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to SVLDRS Demand for Additional Payment of Rs.1,25,23,051/- Due to Incorrect Declaration and Shifting Stands on CENVAT Credit Utilisation Date. The court held that the petitioner's false declaration and inconsistent statements disentitled it from equitable relief under Article 226.

9 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Fork Media Pvt. Ltd., challenged the impugned order (SVLDRS FORM 3) dated 27 January 2022 requiring payment of an additional amount of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure Order Under Section 67(2) of CGST Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Seizure of cash from residential premises of an employee without proper authorization and recording of reasons held invalid, cash ordered to be returned.

20 Feb 2024

The petitioners, B. Kusuma Poonacha and J K Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

14 Sep 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Declaration Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 — Petitioner's Voluntary Disclosure of Service Tax Liability Prior to Summons Entitles It to Scheme Benefits. The court held that issuance of summons after voluntary disclosure does not disqualify the declarant under Section 125(1)(e) of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019.

8 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Saksham Facility Services Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had service tax registration for provid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)