Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Summons Issued Without Jurisdiction — Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction Renders Proceedings Void Ab Initio. The court quashed summons under Section 70 of CGST Act, 2017 issued by an officer in Coimbatore to a Nagpur-based company, holding that the officer lacked territorial jurisdiction.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Private Limited, a Nagpur-based company, challenged summons issued by the Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI, Coimbatore Zonal Unit, under Section 70 of the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner argued that the officer lacked territorial jurisdiction as the company's registered office and business operations were in Nagpur, not Coimbatore. The respondents contended that the officer had jurisdiction due to the location of certain transactions. The court analyzed the provisions of the CGST Act regarding territorial jurisdiction and held that the summons were issued without authority, as the officer had no jurisdiction over the petitioner. The court quashed the summons and directed the respondents to transfer the proceedings to the appropriate officer in Nagpur if necessary. The judgment emphasized that jurisdictional errors render proceedings void ab initio.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Territorial Jurisdiction - GST Summons - Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Section 70 - The court examined whether summons issued by an officer in Coimbatore to a Nagpur-based company were valid. Held that the officer lacked territorial jurisdiction as the petitioner's place of business was in Nagpur, and the summons were issued without authority, rendering them void ab initio (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the summons issued by the Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI, Coimbatore to the petitioner based in Nagpur is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the summons issued by the Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI, Coimbatore, and directed that if any proceedings are to be initiated, they shall be transferred to the appropriate officer having jurisdiction over the petitioner in Nagpur.

Law Points

  • Territorial jurisdiction
  • GST summons
  • void ab initio
  • lack of jurisdiction
  • natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (05) 59

Writ Petition No. 2087 of 2025

2026-05-06

Urmila Joshi Phalke, Nivedita P. Mehta

Mr. Bharat Raichandani, Mr. R.K. Joshi for Petitioner; Mr. Kunal Nalamwar for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4; Mr. A.J. Gohokar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6

M/s D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Private Limited

Union of India & Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging summons issued under Section 70 of CGST Act, 2017 on grounds of lack of territorial jurisdiction.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of summons and direction to transfer proceedings to appropriate officer.

Filing Reason

Summons issued by Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI, Coimbatore to petitioner based in Nagpur, without territorial jurisdiction.

Issues

Whether the summons issued by the Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI, Coimbatore to the petitioner based in Nagpur is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the officer lacked territorial jurisdiction as the company's registered office and business operations are in Nagpur. Respondents contended that the officer had jurisdiction due to location of certain transactions.

Ratio Decidendi

A summons issued by an officer lacking territorial jurisdiction is void ab initio and cannot be sustained. The officer must have jurisdiction over the place of business of the person summoned.

Judgment Excerpts

The summons issued by the Senior Intelligence Officer, Coimbatore, is without jurisdiction and hence void ab initio.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the summons. The court reserved judgment on 24th April 2026 and pronounced on 6th May 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017: Section 70
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Summons Issued Without Jurisdiction — Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction Renders Proceedings Void Ab Initio. The court quashed summons under Section 70 of CGST Act, 2017 issued by an officer in C...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Extension of Letter of Intent for Mining Lease. Court upholds State's decision that extension cannot be granted beyond the maximum period of five years under Rule 7(4) of th...