Search Results for "Bombay Village Panchayats (Gram Sabha Meetings) Rules"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Disqualification Order Against Woman Sarpanch for Failure to Hold Gram Sabha Meeting on Republic Day. Interpretation of Rule 3(2) of Gram Sabha Rules Indicates Meeting Date Not Mandatory, and Onus on Officials to Guide New Electee.

The petitioner, a Scheduled Tribe woman, was directly elected Sarpanch of village Mundgaon on 20.12.2022 and assumed office on 04.01.2023. Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Commissioner's Order in Gram Sabha Resolution Dispute — Procedural Irregularities in Gram Sabha Proceedings Render Resolution Invalid.

The Petitioner, Gajanan Baburao Sankpal, was the Chairman of the Pani Purvatha Ani Swachhata Samiti (Water Supply and Sanitation Committee) constitute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Violation of Natural Justice. Order Passed Without Notice or Hearing Under Section 7 of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 Set Aside.

The petitioner, Nanasaheb s/o Dhondiram Mundhe, was the Sarpanch of village Khandali, Taluka Gangakhed, District Parbhani. He challenged an order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Inclusion of Scheduled Areas in Palghar Municipal Council Limits. Court holds that notification under Municipalities Act prevails over earlier scheduled area declaration.

The petitioners, residents and members of Gram Panchayats of revenue villages Aliyali, Tembhode, Lokmanya Nagar, Vevoor, and Gholveera, filed a writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Service of Notice. Service of Notice on Son Not Valid Service Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Smt. Sampada Vilas Mahargude, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Talewadi, Taluka Atpadi, District Sangli. A motion of no confidence w...