Search Results for "APMC Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "APMC Rules"

90 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Retiral Benefits Against APMC. Court Directs Payment of Provident Fund, Leave Encashment, and Salary Differences as Per Seventh Pay Commission, Upholding Order of District Deputy Registrar.

5 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Laxman Vitthalrao Motegaonkar, was appointed as Junior Clerk by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Sangamner, on 09.09....

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes APMC Notices Requiring License for Poultry Feed Purchase — Food Grains for Personal Consumption Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under KAPMR Act, 1966. Purchase of food grains solely for feeding poultry is personal consumption, not trade, and does not require license under the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966.

6 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Lakshmi Poultry Complex and Kittur Chennamma Poultry Farm, are engaged in large-scale poultry farming, rearing around five lakh b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Lottery Allotment of Large Gala in APMC Market, Sets Aside High Court's Order Directing Allotment to Respondent No.2. The Court held that the High Court erred in relying on an earlier order of the Director of Agricultural Marketing without independently assessing eligibility, and that the lottery method was valid.

10 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Bombay High Court's judgment dated 21.11.2018, which directed the allotment of large Gala No.F-158 in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Confectionery and Food Drinks Under APMC Act. Confectionery and Food Drinks Are Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under Section 2(a) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963, and Hence Not Subject to Market Fee.

18 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Cadbury India Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, manufactures confectionery and food drinks at its ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

3 Aug 2017

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Members Challenging Government Circular on Term of Committee — Statutory Rule Under Rule 14(4) of KAPM(R&D) Rules, 1968 Prevails. The court held that the term of the committee continues until the first meeting of the newly constituted committee, and a government circular cannot override the statutory rule.

13 Jun 2016

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) challenging a government c...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of APMC Bye-Laws Requiring Traders to Obtain Licenses and Pay Market Fees — Held that Bye-Laws Framed Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 Are Statutory and Binding. Writ petitions challenging bye-laws dismissed as not maintainable without challenging the parent Act.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who are members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, filed writ petitions challenging the validity of certain bye...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator for APMC Committee — Appointment of Administrator Without Prior Notice and Without Considering Representation Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that the power under Section 121 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 must be exercised in accordance with natural justice, and failure to issue show cause notice renders the appointment invalid.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who were the President, Vice President, and members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), challenged the ap...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Committee Members Challenging Government Circular Curtailing Term. Section 7(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 mandates continuation of committee until newly elected committee assumes office, overriding executive instructions.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, challenged a Government Circular dated 22-04-2016 that purported to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Amalgamation Notification for Lack of Consent — Amalgamation Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Requires Consent of Both Market Committees. Withdrawal of Consent by One Committee Renders the Process Invalid.

17 Aug 2010

The petitioners, Sopanrao Sathe (Chairman) and the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Malkapur, challenged a notification dated 17-01-2009 ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)