High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging the Constitutionality of Maharashtra Act IX of 2017. Petitioners Contend that Multi-Member Wards and Direct Election of President Violate Article 243R and Equality Clauses.
28 Sep 2018...
Search Results for "construction violation"
2912 result(s) found
Found 2912 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Declines to Interfere in Tender Award for Ash Handling Plant; Holds Scope of Judicial Review Limited and Finds No Arbitrariness in Awarding Contract to Lowest Bidder Consortium Despite Office Memorandum Barring Chinese Companies.
2 Nov 2022The writ petition was filed by Macawber Beekay Pvt. Ltd. challenging the notice inviting tender dated 24.06.2022 and the consequent letter of intent i...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Royalty and Penalty Imposed on IKEA for Earth Excavated During Store Development. Earth Excavated and Utilised for Backfilling, Levelling, and Internal Roads on the Same Plot Is Exempt from Royalty Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Read with Rule 46 of the Extraction Rules, 2013.
10 Apr 2024The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by IKEA India Private Limited and its authorised officer, challenging the demand for royalty and p...
- 18
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Commercial Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Appeal Questions the Upholding of Arbitral Award Granting Remuneration and Indemnity Under Reconstitution Deed of Partnership Firm.
30 Apr 2026The present Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of PIL and Writ Petition Challenging FSI Increase in Mumbai Suburbs under MRTP Act. Petitioners Contended Notifications Violated Article 14 and 21 and Amounted to Major Modification Not Permissible under Section 37 of MRTP Act.
10 Jun 2010This incomplete judgment text of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerns two petitions: Public Interest...
- 30
Supreme Court
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4905 OF 2022
1 Jan 1970The present civil appeal arose under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 challenging the order dated 19.04.2022 passed...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Technical Bid in Railway Tender — Interpretation of 'Present Contract Value' Found Arbitrary and Irrational. The court held that the expression 'present contract value' in Clause 2.2.2.1(ii) of the RFP means the value of the present contract (Rs.696 crores) and not the qualifying contract value, and directed reconsideration of the petitioner's technical bid.
13 Mar 2025The petitioner, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., a public sector undertaking under the Ministry of Railways, challenged the rejection of its technical...
- 755
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Construction of World's Highest Railway Bridge. Division Bench's Interference with Concurrent Findings of Arbitral Tribunal and Single Judge Set Aside for Exceeding Section 37 Scope.
18 Jul 2023The appeal arises from a dispute between Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (appellant) and Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking (respondent) concerning ...
- 168
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder's Second Appeals Against RERA Appellate Tribunal Order for Refund with Interest to Homebuyers. Failure to Deliver Possession Within Agreed Time Constitutes 'Default' Under Section 18 of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, Entitling Allottees to Full Refund with Interest.
20 Feb 2024The appellant, Balaji Construction Company, a promoter, entered into agreements with various allottees for the sale of apartments in a project. The ag...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Building Plan Sanction by Nagpur Improvement Trust Due to PIL Prohibitory Order. Court Directs NIT to Consider Application on Merits Without Reference to PIL Order, Holding That Prohibitory Order Does Not Create Absolute Bar.
14 Feb 2023The petitioners, Kartiki Jagdish Pawar and Sanjyoti Jagdish Pawar, purchased a plot in Nagpur from Dashrath Balaji Kalambe, who had originally bought ...
- 44
