GULFISHA FATIMA
1 Jan 1970The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...
Search Results for "advocate withdrawal"
1984 result(s) found
Found 1984 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Writ Petition Against Industrial Tribunal Award. Award Directed Reinstatement of Workman Dismissed During Conciliation as Void Under Section 33(1)(a) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
6 Aug 2014The dispute arose from the charge-sheet issued on 28 January 1997 by M/s. Gulf Air to its employee Vinod Malhotra, a Passenger Service Supervisor and ...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Bombay Quashes Appellate Order Dismissing Eviction Suit, Holding Suit Not Barred by Limitation and Licensee Not Tenant, and Remands for Fresh Hearing. License Agreement Did Not Create Tenancy; Defendants Failed to Prove Protected Licensee Status Under Section 15A of Bombay Rent Act.
3 Nov 2025This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 25.06.2003 passed by the Appellate ...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Bombay Quashes Prosecution Under MRTP Act Due to Limitation Bar — Non-Compliance with Demolition Notice Held Not a Continuing Offence. The Court held that offence under Section 53(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, is complete upon failure to comply with notice within prescribed period, and the mere continuance of unauthorized construction does not keep the offence alive for purposes of limitation under Section 468 Cr.P.C.
12 Feb 2013The petitioners, who were accused in a criminal case under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, challenged the rejection of their ple...
- 56
High Court
High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Disqualification of Councillor Under Section 10(1D) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. Alleged Illegal Construction by Councillor's Wife Was the Basis for Disqualification Under MRTP Act and MMC Act.
29 Nov 2021The petitioner, Avinash Ramesh Bagwe, was elected as a Councillor of the Pune Municipal Corporation on 23 February 2017 from a reserved Scheduled Cast...
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge by Co-operative Housing Society to Interim Injunction and Procedural Orders in Deemed Conveyance Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Suit Challenging Deemed Conveyance Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 is Maintainable Without Compliance with Section 164 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and Whether Interim Injunction Was Properly Granted.
29 Sep 2021The dispute arose over property at City Survey No.112-A (1 to 5), Plot No.5, Mouza Panchpakadi, Thane, admeasuring 648.85 sq. meters, where a building...
High Court
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Split Bench Delivers Dissenting Opinion on Bar Council Election Rules Validity; Dissenting Judge Holds Rules 6(h) and 32(g) Intra Vires Advocates Act. The dissenting opinion concluded that the impugned election rules did not violate Sections 3(2)(b), 3(4) and 49(1)(a) of the Advocates Act, 1961.
13 Dec 2006This matter concerned two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of certain rules of the Bar Council of Maharashtr...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes Pending Applications and Show Cause Notices in Scheme of Compromise Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956. Criminal Proceedings Under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 Allowed to Continue Notwithstanding Sanction of Scheme.
7 Jan 2010The matter arose from a scheme of compromise and arrangement proposed by Europlast India Ltd. under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The unsecu...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Bar Council Resolution Prohibiting Full-Time Salaried Law Officers from Practicing as Advocates. The Court Held That the Deletion of Exception Under Rule 49 of the Advocates Act, 1961 Is Valid and Applies to Municipal Law Officers.
17 Oct 2012The case involves a challenge by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its Principal Law Officer against resolutions of the Bar Council of I...
- 166
