Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA's Peripheral Ring Road. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-09-16 04:01:57
  • 126
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010050652008_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (07) 36

Writ Petition No. 4550 of 2008 (LA-BDA) and connected matters

2014-07-22

Anand Byrareddy

Padmanabha V Mahale, Hareesh Bhandary T, D. Nagaraj, I.G. Gachchinamath

Sudhakar Hegde, Smt. Ranjintha Hegde and other petitioners

State of Karnataka, Bangalore Development Authority, The Land Acquisition Officer, BDA

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of preliminary notification dated 15.11.2006 and final notification dated 29.06.2007 issued by the BDA for formation of Peripheral Ring Road.

Filing Reason

The petitioners' lands were notified for acquisition without complying with mandatory legal requirements.

Procedural History

Petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the land acquisition notifications. The petitions were heard together.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Land Acquisition Peripheral Ring Road Bangalore Development Authority Writ Petition Quashing

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal from Service by Co-operative Bank. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice in Inquiry While Respondents Contend Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Industrial Disputes A... 2026-09-16 18:37:55
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Considers Constitutional Validity of Kerala Government Circulars Restricting Pump Set Distribution to State Agencies. The Court Examines Whether Executive Instructions Favoring KAICO and RAIDCO Over Private Dealers Violate Articles 14 a... 2026-09-16 18:37:51
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?