Search Results for "regional commissioner"

1729 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1729 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Employee by MSRTC — Violation of Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Termination without notice or compensation held illegal and set aside.

The petitioner, M.A. Azim, was employed as a clerk with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) from 3 June 1968 and was promoted to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Food Corporation of India Against Railway Claims Tribunal Order Dismissing Claim for Non-Compliance of Section 80 CPC. Notice Under Section 80 CPC Not Required for Claims Before Railway Claims Tribunal as It Is Not a Civil Court.

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed a suit in the Civil Court at Jalgaon on 15.10.1981 for recovery of Rs.30,125/- due to short delivery of 241 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Allotment to Educational Society — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as No Legal Right Established Over Final Plot No.80

The petitioner, Abdul Hamid Ebrahim Chotani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a Standing Committe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Show Cause Notice in Encroachment Case — No Writ Lies Against Show Cause Notice Without Established Legal Right. Petitioner Failed to Establish Legal Right to Challenge Notice Under Section 128(1)(b) of Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998.

The petitioner, D. Manoharan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a notice d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Encroachment Notice Under TNULB Act — Show Cause Notice Not Entertainable Under Article 226. Petitioner Failed to Establish Legal Right; Authorities Directed to Follow Procedure Under Section 128 Before Removal.

The petitioner, Thirumalai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 19.01.2026 issued by the 4...