Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Food Corporation of India Against Railway Claims Tribunal Order Dismissing Claim for Non-Compliance of Section 80 CPC. Notice Under Section 80 CPC Not Required for Claims Before Railway Claims Tribunal as It Is Not a Civil Court.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 60
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed a suit in the Civil Court at Jalgaon on 15.10.1981 for recovery of Rs.30,125/- due to short delivery of 241 bags of wheat and refund of freight of Rs.6,153/-. The consignment of 3245 bags of wheat was booked from Butari to Jalgaon via railway, and upon delivery, 241 bags were found missing. FCI lodged a claim on 16.11.1978, but the railways neglected to pay. The suit was later transferred to the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, under Section 18 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The Tribunal dismissed the application on 8.1.1991 on the ground that the claim was not maintainable for non-compliance with Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as no notice was given to the Union of India before filing the suit. FCI appealed to the Bombay High Court. The High Court held that the Railway Claims Tribunal is not a civil court and is not bound by the procedural requirements of the CPC. The Tribunal was established under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, to adjudicate claims relating to railway matters, and its procedure is governed by its own Act and Regulations, not by the CPC. Therefore, the requirement of notice under Section 80 CPC does not apply to proceedings before the Tribunal. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order, and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh disposal on merits, directing the parties to appear on 20.3.2006.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Section 80 CPC - Applicability to Railway Claims Tribunal - Section 80 CPC not applicable to proceedings before Railway Claims Tribunal - The Railway Claims Tribunal is not a civil court and is not bound by the procedural requirements of the CPC, including Section 80 notice - Held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim for want of notice under Section 80 CPC (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Railway Claims Tribunal could dismiss the appellant's claim on the ground of non-compliance with Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, when the claim was filed before the Tribunal after transfer from a civil court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The order dated 8.1.1991 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, in Application No. 1155/TAI/RCT/NGP/90 is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Railway Claims Tribunal for fresh disposal on merits. The parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 20.3.2006.

Law Points

  • Section 80 CPC not applicable to Railway Claims Tribunal
  • Railway Claims Tribunal is not a civil court
  • notice under Section 80 CPC not mandatory for claims before Railway Claims Tribunal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (02) 61

First Appeal No. 326 of 1991

2006-02-07

Smt. V.A. Naik, J.

Mr. C.S. Samudra for the Appellant, Mr. P. S. Lambat for the Respondents

M/s Food Corporation of India

The Union of India, represented by General Manager, Northern Railways, New Delhi and The Union of India, represented by General Manager, Central Railway, Bombay

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of Railway Claims Tribunal dismissing claim for non-compliance of Section 80 CPC

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of Tribunal's order and restoration of claim for adjudication on merits

Filing Reason

The Railway Claims Tribunal dismissed the appellant's claim on the ground that no notice under Section 80 CPC was given to the Union of India before filing the suit

Previous Decisions

The Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, by order dated 8.1.1991 in Application No. 1155/TAI/RCT/NGP/90 dismissed the application as not maintainable for non-compliance of Section 80 CPC

Issues

Whether the Railway Claims Tribunal could dismiss the claim on the ground of non-compliance with Section 80 CPC Whether Section 80 CPC applies to proceedings before the Railway Claims Tribunal

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Railway Claims Tribunal is not a civil court and Section 80 CPC does not apply to its proceedings Respondent argued that the suit was originally filed in a civil court and Section 80 CPC was mandatory

Ratio Decidendi

The Railway Claims Tribunal is not a civil court and is not bound by the procedural requirements of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Therefore, the requirement of notice under Section 80 CPC does not apply to claims filed before the Railway Claims Tribunal. The Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim on that ground.

Judgment Excerpts

The Railway Claims Tribunal is not a civil court and is not bound by the procedural requirements of the Code of Civil Procedure. The requirement of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not apply to the proceedings before the Railway Claims Tribunal.

Procedural History

FCI filed Special Civil Suit No.94 of 1981 in the Court of Civil Judge, Sr.Dn., Jalgaon on 15.10.1981. The suit was transferred to the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, under Section 18 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The Tribunal dismissed the application on 8.1.1991 for non-compliance of Section 80 CPC. FCI appealed to the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 80
  • Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987: Section 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demolition of Bungalow Without Notice Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Demolition Without Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal and Violative of Natural Justice.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Food Corporation of India Against Railway Claims Tribunal Order Dismissing Claim for Non-Compliance of Section 80 CPC. Notice Under Section 80 CPC Not Required for Claims Before Railway Claims Tribunal as It Is Not ...