Search Results for "declaration void"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "declaration void"

2675 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2675 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Construction of Shopping Complex Within Prohibited Highway Area; Directions for Demolition Sought by Shirdi Councillors Based on Violation of Building Bye-Law and Lack of No-Objection Certificate.

20 Dec 2017

The writ petition concerns a challenge to the construction of a shopping complex on land bearing survey no. 170/A2/1 abutting the Nagar-Manmad highway...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal Against Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Holds Suit Not Barred by Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Plaintiffs, Claiming Independent Rights as Co-owners and Not Being Parties to Loan/Mortgage Transaction, Could Not Be Barred Under Section 34 as Their Suit Challenges Mortgage Validity Only Against Their Share, Not the Securitization Process Itself.

8 Dec 2010

The dispute arose from a loan transaction between State Bank of India (appellant/first defendant) and Crosslink Shipbreakers (P) Ltd. (principal borro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Suit, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Possession and Limitation. The court held that the lower appellate court's findings on possession were perverse and not based on evidence, requiring a fresh adjudication on limitation and adverse possession under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves three second appeals arising from a suit for possession filed by Salvador Quadros (respondent/plaintiff) against Conceicao Quadros a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Declaration Suit — Upholds Trial Court Decree Based on Adverse Possession and Valid Title. Concurrent findings of fact regarding possession and title cannot be disturbed in appeal without substantial error.

31 Oct 2013

The case involves two Regular First Appeals (RFA No.429/2003 and RFA No.506/2003) filed against the judgment and decree dated 13.1.2003 passed by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Mutation Entries and Communications Vesting Wakf Properties in Custodian of Enemy Property; Holds Consent Order Binding on Custodian. Court Declares That Once a Consent Order Withdraws a Vesting Certificate Under the Enemy Property Act, 1968, the Custodian Cannot Subsequently Claim Vesting Without Fresh Adjudication.

22 Jul 2026

The Bombay High Court allowed three writ petitions challenging the communications and mutation entries by which the Custodian of Enemy Property sought...

High Court

KAHC010306442014_1

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapsing Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions sought declarations that acquisition proceedings under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and Mysore Urban Development Authority Act had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 24 of the 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court examines claims of land acquisition lapsing under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 in writ petitions against Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority. The petitioners sought declarations that acquisition had lapsed under Section 24 of the 2013 Act, citing non-compliance with statutory timelines.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...

93 94 95 96 97

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)