Search Results for "Dispute Application"

19546 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19546 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Chief Information Commissioner's Appeal in RTI Case Against High Court. Section 22 of RTI Act Overrides Gujarat High Court Rules Requiring Affidavit for Third-Party Copy Requests.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Chief Information Commissioner against a Gujarat High Court Division Bench order that set aside the CIC'...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity and Long Incarceration. The court held that the quantity of Codeine (200 grams) was less than commercial quantity (1000 grams), thus Section 37 NDPS Act not attracted, and granted bail considering the period of custody.

The applicant, Mukesh Rajaram Chaudhari, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal of Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme Benefit to Development Officer. Court holds that the Scheme's eligibility conditions are clear and the petitioner's application was rightly rejected as he did not meet the qualifying service requirement.

The petitioner, K.G.H. Dodhiya, joined the New India Assurance Company Limited as a Development Officer on 16 April 1977 and later became an Administr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs EPFO to Pay Interest on Delayed Provident Fund Settlement — Paragraph 60(6) of EPF Scheme 1952 Held Not a Bar to Interest Claim. Petitioner entitled to interest from date of retirement till actual payment under Paragraph 72(7) of EPF Scheme 1952.

The petitioner, Mr. M.V. Kanakaraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to the Regional C...