Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity and Long Incarceration. The court held that the quantity of Codeine (200 grams) was less than commercial quantity (1000 grams), thus Section 37 NDPS Act not attracted, and granted bail considering the period of custody.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Mukesh Rajaram Chaudhari, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for offences punishable under Sections 8(c) and 22(c) of the Act. The case arose from a secret information received on 17.09.2021 that a person carrying contraband Codeine and Chlorpheniramine mixed with cough syrup would be near Ghatkopar Mankhurd link road public toilet. The police raided the spot and apprehended the applicant, who was carrying a khaki coloured gunny bag containing 200 bottles of cough syrup. Each bottle was 100 ml, and the label indicated that every 5 ml contained 10 mg of Codeine Phosphate. The total quantity of Codeine was calculated as 200 grams. The applicant was arrested and has been in custody since 17.09.2021. The main legal issues were whether the quantity of contraband was commercial, attracting the twin conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, and whether the search violated Section 50 of the Act. The court noted that the commercial quantity for Codeine is 1000 grams, and the small quantity is 100 grams. Since the recovered quantity was 200 grams, it fell in the intermediate category, and thus the rigors of Section 37 were not attracted. Regarding Section 50, the court held that the contraband was recovered from a bag, not from the person of the accused, and therefore Section 50 was not applicable. The court also considered the period of incarceration (about 2 years) and that the trial was not likely to conclude soon. Consequently, the court granted bail on certain conditions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Bail - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8(c), 22(c), 37, 50 - Bail Application - Applicant was found carrying 200 bottles of cough syrup containing Codeine Phosphate and Chlorpheniramine Maleate - Quantity of Codeine was 200 grams, which is less than commercial quantity (1000 grams) but more than small quantity (100 grams) - Held that the rigors of Section 37 are not attracted as the quantity is intermediate - Further, search of bag not amounting to personal search, Section 50 not applicable - However, considering the period of incarceration and other factors, bail granted (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under the NDPS Act, considering the quantity of contraband recovered and compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Bail granted to the applicant on certain conditions.

Law Points

  • Bail under NDPS Act
  • Section 37 NDPS Act
  • Section 50 NDPS Act
  • Commercial quantity
  • Twin conditions for bail
  • Right to be informed of search
  • Recovery of contraband from bag
  • Personal search vs. bag search
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (09) 55

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 54 OF 2023

2023-09-27

M. S. Karnik, J.

2023:BHC-AS:28549

Mr. Mithilesh Mishra for the Applicant, Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State

Mukesh Rajaram Chaudhari

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Bail application under NDPS Act for offences under Sections 8(c) and 22(c).

Remedy Sought

Applicant seeks bail pending trial.

Filing Reason

Applicant was arrested for possession of 200 bottles of cough syrup containing Codeine Phosphate and Chlorpheniramine Maleate.

Issues

Whether the quantity of contraband (Codeine) is commercial, attracting Section 37 NDPS Act? Whether the search violated Section 50 NDPS Act? Whether the applicant is entitled to bail?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the quantity of Codeine is 200 grams, less than commercial quantity (1000 grams), so Section 37 not attracted. Applicant argued that the search of the bag does not require compliance with Section 50. State opposed bail citing the seriousness of the offence and that the quantity is more than small quantity.

Ratio Decidendi

The quantity of Codeine recovered (200 grams) is less than the commercial quantity (1000 grams) as per the NDPS Act, hence the rigors of Section 37 are not attracted. The search of the bag does not amount to personal search, so Section 50 is not applicable. Considering the period of incarceration and the likelihood of delay in trial, bail is granted.

Judgment Excerpts

The quantity of Codeine recovered is 200 grams which is less than the commercial quantity of 1000 grams. The rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not attracted. The search of the bag does not amount to personal search, hence Section 50 is not applicable.

Procedural History

The applicant was arrested on 17.09.2021 and has been in custody since. He filed Bail Application No. 54 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court. The application was heard and reserved on 13.09.2023, and judgment was pronounced on 27.09.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 8(c), 22(c), 37, 50
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Dying declaration recorded by Executive Magistrate found unreliable as deceased was under influence of medication and declarations were contradictory, lea...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Deceased was not wearing helmet and had no valid driving license, contributing to accident; insurer's lia...