Search Results for "Infrastructure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Infrastructure"

2353 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2353 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Medium Enterprise to Invoke MSMED Act Arbitration as Supplier of Small Enterprise Goods. The court held that a Medium Enterprise can invoke Section 18 of the MSMED Act, 2006 if it supplies goods manufactured by a small enterprise, relying on the definition of 'supplier' under Section 2(n)(iii).

20 Jul 2022

The petitioner, M/s. Metaforge Engineering (I) P. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act and classified as a Medium Enterprise, filed an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

23 Aug 2022

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Award in Property Dispute — Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Allowed on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the arbitrator's computation of amounts and interest under clause 9 of the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements was patently illegal and contrary to the terms of the contract.

23 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Dhiraj Lakhamashi Shah and another, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Bridge Construction Dispute — No Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy. The court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses regarding fixed and variable costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity.

23 Sep 2022

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a Single Judge's order dismissing a Section 34 pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Application Under Section 8 of Arbitration Act, 1996 — Dispute Referred to Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Signatory to Arbitration Agreement. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement between parties is a jurisdictional fact to be decided by the trial court before referring parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Sep 2022

The petitioners, M/s TCI Infrastructure Limited and M/s Transport Corporation of India Limited, filed a suit before the 6th Joint Civil Judge, Senior ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

17 Nov 2022

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Part in Development Charge Levy Dispute. Development Charge on Already Developed Land Held Illegal Under Section 124 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

9 Dec 2022

The petitioner, Sir Gangadharrao Chitnavis Memorial Medical Research Trust, a charitable trust, owned Plot No. 56 at Temple Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Mar 2021

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Application, Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Development Agreement Dispute. Court holds that disputes regarding termination of a development agreement and recovery of possession are arbitrable, and that the arbitration clause survives termination of the agreement.

19 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Westin Sankalp Developers, a registered partnership firm, entered into a Development Agreement dated 30th April 2012 with the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Maintainability Challenge and Upholds RERA Recovery Certificate in Allottee Refund Case. Real Estate Regulatory Authority Has Power to Issue Recovery Certificate Under Section 40(1) of RERA Act, 2016 for Refund Orders.

9 Mar 2020

The judgment pertains to two connected matters: an Interim Application filed by the developer, Marvel Sigma Homes Pvt. Ltd., challenging the maintaina...

89 90 91 92 93

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)