Bombay High Court Allows Medium Enterprise to Invoke MSMED Act Arbitration as Supplier of Small Enterprise Goods. The court held that a Medium Enterprise can invoke Section 18 of the MSMED Act, 2006 if it supplies goods manufactured by a small enterprise, relying on the definition of 'supplier' under Section 2(n)(iii).

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Metaforge Engineering (I) P. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act and classified as a Medium Enterprise, filed an application under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED Act) against respondent no. 4 for payment of dues. The Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council rejected the application on the ground that the petitioner, being a Medium Enterprise, could not invoke the jurisdiction of the Council under Section 18. The petitioner contended that it was a supplier of goods manufactured by a small enterprise and thus fell within the definition of 'supplier' under Section 2(n)(iii) of the Act. The respondents supported the Council's order, arguing that only micro or small enterprises could avail the remedy under Section 18. The High Court examined the definition of 'supplier' under Section 2(n)(iii), which includes any person who supplies goods manufactured by a small enterprise. The court held that the classification of the supplier itself is irrelevant; what matters is that the goods supplied are manufactured by a small enterprise. Therefore, a Medium Enterprise can invoke Section 18 if it supplies goods of a small enterprise. The court relied on the Delhi High Court judgment in Ramky Infrastructure Private Limited v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council. The court set aside the Council's order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration on merits, directing the Council to decide the application in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises - Supplier Definition - Section 2(n)(iii) and Section 18 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 - Medium Enterprise as Supplier - The petitioner, a Medium Enterprise, supplied goods manufactured by a small enterprise. The Facilitation Council rejected its application under Section 18 on the ground that the petitioner is a Medium Enterprise. The High Court held that the definition of 'supplier' under Section 2(n)(iii) includes any person who supplies goods manufactured by a small enterprise, regardless of the supplier's own classification. Therefore, a Medium Enterprise can invoke Section 18 if it supplies goods of a small enterprise. The court relied on the Delhi High Court judgment in Ramky Infrastructure Private Limited v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council. The order of the Council was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration. (Paras 6-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a Medium Enterprise, which is a supplier of goods manufactured by a small enterprise, can invoke the jurisdiction of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council under Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court set aside the order of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council and remitted the matter for fresh consideration on merits, directing the Council to decide the application in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of 'supplier' under Section 2(n)(iii) of MSMED Act
  • 2006
  • Medium Enterprise can invoke Section 18 if it supplies goods of small enterprise
  • Liberal interpretation to achieve object of Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (07) 41

Writ Petition No. 3034 of 2022

2022-07-20

S.V. Gangapurwala, Sandeep V. Marne

2022:BHC-AS:16976-DB

Mr. Alankar Kirpekar a/w Mr. Sagar Kasar for Petitioner, Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly a/w Mr. Jitendra Mishra and Ms. Sangeeta Yadav for Respondent no.1, Mr. Amol Wagh a/w Ms. Chaitali Bhogle for Respondent no.4

M/s. Metaforge Engineering (I) P. Ltd.

Union of India and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging rejection of application under Section 18 of MSMED Act by Facilitation Council

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to invoke jurisdiction of Facilitation Council for payment of amount under Section 18 of MSMED Act

Filing Reason

Council rejected application on ground that petitioner is a Medium Enterprise and cannot invoke Section 18

Previous Decisions

Council rejected application; no prior court decisions

Issues

Whether a Medium Enterprise can invoke Section 18 of MSMED Act as a supplier of goods manufactured by a small enterprise

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued it is a supplier under Section 2(n)(iii) and covered under Section 18, relying on Delhi High Court judgment in Ramky Infrastructure Respondents argued that only micro or small enterprises can avail remedy under Section 18

Ratio Decidendi

The definition of 'supplier' under Section 2(n)(iii) of the MSMED Act includes any person who supplies goods manufactured by a small enterprise, irrespective of the supplier's own classification. Therefore, a Medium Enterprise can invoke Section 18 if it supplies goods of a small enterprise.

Judgment Excerpts

The definition of 'supplier' under section 2(n)(iii) includes any person who supplies goods manufactured by a small enterprise. The classification of the supplier itself is irrelevant. What is relevant is that the goods supplied are manufactured by a small enterprise. If a Medium Enterprise supplies goods manufactured by a small enterprise, it would be covered under the definition of 'supplier' and would be entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of the Council under section 18 of the Act, 2006.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed application under Section 18 of MSMED Act before Facilitation Council; Council rejected application on ground that petitioner is a Medium Enterprise; Petitioner filed Writ Petition before Bombay High Court challenging the rejection.

Acts & Sections

  • Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006: 2(n)(iii), 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Medium Enterprise to Invoke MSMED Act Arbitration as Supplier of Small Enterprise Goods. The court held that a Medium Enterprise can invoke Section 18 of the MSMED Act, 2006 if it supplies goods manufactured by a small enterp...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Retrenchment Case — Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act Does Not Automatically Entitle Workman to Reinstatement; Compensation of Rs. 50,000 Awarded Instead. The court held that relief for i...