Search Results for "Separate assessment"

2084 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2084 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Batch of Petitions by Retailers and Others Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property. The levy of service tax on renting was contested under the Finance Act, 1994, Sections 65–66, on constitutional grounds.

The judgment, delivered orally on August 4, 2011, by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court comprising Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and Anoop V. Mohta, JJ....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010448052021_1

These Miscellaneous First Appeals were filed by the Assistant Executive Engineer of Visvesvaraya Jala Nigam Limited, the acquiring body, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case - Claimants Awarded Higher Market Value and Separate Compensation for Structures and Trees. Market Value Determined at Rs. 1500 per R for Jirayat Land Based on Sale Instances Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, original claimants, owned land in village Kuslumb, Taluka Patoda, District Beed, which was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholding Trial Court's Dismissal Due to Prior Partition and Wills. Properties Already Dealt With Under Prior Partition Deed (Ex.D-3) and Testamentary Succession (Ex.D-4, D-7) Leaving No Joint Family Property for Partition.

The litigation arose out of a suit for partition filed by the appellant, Smt. Jaywanthi K. Kapadia, who is one of the legal heirs of late A. Venilal. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...