Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Filed by Unemployed Candidates Against Postal Recruitment Process. The Petitioners Seek Relief from Alleged Irregularities in Recruitment by the Postal Department Under the Ministry of Posts, Communications & Information Technology.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
Admin
2026-10-13 19:00:46
  • 94
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who are unemployed individuals, filed writ petitions challenging actions of the Union of India through the Ministry of Posts, Communications & Information Technology and the Chief Post Master General, Maharashtra Circle, in relation to postal recruitment. However, the judgment text provided only includes the list of parties and no substantive legal discussion or decision. Therefore, the specific grounds, legal issues, arguments, and outcome are not available.

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO.12117 OF 2016

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (05) 9

Writ Petition No. 12117 of 2016 and Writ Petition No. 30 of 2017

Shri. P. M. Shah, Sr. Counsel i/b Dr. Swapnil D. Tawshikar, advocate for the petitioners; Shri. Anil Singh, Addl. Solicitor General of India with Shri. Bhushan Kulkarni, St. Counsel for respondents No. 1 to 3

Prakash s/o Bhagaji Wani and Others (57 petitioners in WP 12117/2016), Bhagwan s/o Dhondiba Ghuge and Others (51 petitioners in WP 30/2017)

Union of India, through the Secretary to Ministry of Posts, Communications & Information Technology, Delhi; The Chief Post Master General, Maharashtra Circle, Mumbai; The Assistant Director, Postal Services (Recruitment), Maharashtra Circle, Mumbai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now
Tags :
writ petition postal recruitment unemployed candidates High Court Bombay Aurangabad Bench

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in IPC Case Due to Inadequate Custodial Sentence. Court Emphasizes Necessity of Custodial Sentence Under Section 326 IPC. 2026-11-08 01:26:57
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Election Petition Case Holding Candidate Disqualified for Holding Office of Profit Under Government. Lawyer on Railway Panel and Professor in Government College Deemed to Hold Office of Profit Under Representation of... 2026-11-08 01:26:55
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Murder acquittal natural justice Compensation land acquisition burden of proof jurisdiction limitation circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court Upholds Petition for Incentive FSI in Redevelopment of Mixed Structures — Cla...

High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pension Benefits Due to Long Service. Court Recognizes...

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Credible Testimon...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Decree on Wi...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Limitation Dispute Over Civil Works Contract. The Court fou...

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Employees in Public Service — Validity of...

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Process in Forest Areas While Ensuring Compliance with Fore...

Lost Your Password?