KAHC010023912010_1
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "selective sanction"
92 result(s) found
Found 92 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for a Residential Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.
11 Jul 2014The provided judgment text is an incomplete excerpt containing only the listing of multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka. T...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals Against Land Acquisition for Sir M. Visveswaraya Layout; Upholds Single Judge's Order. The appeals challenged acquisition notifications under Sections 17(1) and 19(1) of the BDA Act, 1976, alleging arbitrary exclusion and violation of constitutional rights.
3 Apr 2025This matter concerns four writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated June 6, 2006, of ...
High Court
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Clarifies Scope of Section 3 of Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 in Reference Regarding Land Transfers by Non-Tribals. The court held that Section 3 applies to any transfer of land originally belonging to a tribal, regardless of the transferor's status, and that the burden of proof is on the claimant tribal to show original tribal ownership and first transfer in contravention.
21 Apr 2023The case involves a reference to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a recurring question regarding the interpretation of Section 3 of ...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Against BDA’s Land Acquisition Notifications for Layout Formation. The petitions challenged the preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and the final notification under the BDA Act.
11 Jul 2014A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners, who a...
- 25
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses BDA Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge Order Quashing Acquisition for Lapse of Time and Non-Compliance with Section 11A of LARR Act. The court held that failure to pass award within two years from Section 6 declaration renders acquisition void, and alternative remedy under Section 18 is not a bar when acquisition is invalid.
3 Jan 2020The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA) against a common order of a learned Single Judge dated 16.06.201...
- 147
High Court
KAHC010022932010_1
11 Jul 2014A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, challengi...
- 69
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Against Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout; Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Under BDA Act, 1976.
11 Jul 2014Multiple writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedi...
- 68
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, reserved judgment in three writ petitions seeking mandamus to compensate farmers for post-harvest soybean crop losses under Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana-2020. The petitions challenged the insurance company's rejection of claims based on non-compliance with a 72-hour intimation requirement despite government data showing over 33% crop loss.
6 May 2022The proceedings comprised three matters before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court: Public Interest Litigation No. 91 of 2021, Public Intere...
