Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions by Judicial Officers Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Payments. Petitions Seek to Quash Show Cause Notices Issued by District Authorities and Refund of Amounts Already Recovered.
9 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "recovery impermissible"
667 result(s) found
Found 667 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last seen theory and recovery of stolen articles establish guilt under Sections 302, 392, 452 IPC.
17 Apr 2024The appellant, Nareshkumar Rajpal Bagdi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane for the murder of Shrimati Shraddha Pardeshi and for ro...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Leave and License Dispute — Interim Relief Granted to Licensee Pending Suit. The court held that the licensee had a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favour, and the license was irrevocable under Section 60(b) of the Indian Easements Act, 1882.
22 Dec 2023The petitioner, Wework India Management Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Reference in Corruption Case: Demand Must Be Proved by Direct or Circumstantial Evidence, Not Mere Recovery. Proof of demand is sine qua non for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and presumption under Section 20 arises only after demand is established.
15 Dec 2022This reference to a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court arose from a conflict between three-judge bench decisions regarding the proof of demand of...
- 248
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Recovery of Excess Payments from In-Service Nursing Trainees Under Restitution Principle. Recovery Permitted as Payments Were Made Pursuant to Court Order Later Set Aside, Distinguishing Mistaken Payment Guidelines Under Rafiq Masih Case for Class III and IV Employees.
29 Mar 2022The dispute originated from in-service employees of the Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service, working as ANMs, Lab Technicians, and similar ...
- 332
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Exemption from Marathi Shorthand Examination - Petitioner Granted Exemption Under Rule 10 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Compulsory Marathi Shorthand and Marathi Typing Examinations for English Stenographers and English Typists) Rules, 1991. The court quashed the order of the Desk Officer for non-application of mind and directed the State Government to consider the proposal afresh.
1 Sep 2017The petitioner, Ramkrishna Narayan Ghuge, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 18th May 20...
- 80
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Restraining Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Employee Without Fraud or Misrepresentation. Recovery of excess payment made to an employee due to administrative error, without any fraud or misrepresentation by the employee, is not permissible.
6 Jun 2016The Union of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (C...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Declares Assignment of Assets by Ex-Director Void Under Sections 536(2) and 537(1)(b) of Companies Act, 1956 — Post-Winding Up Sale Without Court Leave Invalid. The court held that any disposition of company property after winding up without court approval is void, and subrogation does not permit sale of assets without leave of the court.
21 Oct 2015The judgment concerns two reports filed by the Official Liquidator seeking a declaration that a Deed of Assignment dated 14.03.2012 executed by Mr. Sh...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Rejecting Claim for Balance Payment Under Cable Laying Contract. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Deductions and Lack of Evidence, Holding No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
10 Jun 2013The petitioner, M/s. Reunion Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd., was awarded a contract on 23 January 2002 by the respondent, M/s. Petronet MHB Ltd., to lay ca...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Extension of Toll Collection Period in BOT Road Project. Court holds that concession period extension is a contractual matter and not subject to judicial review under Article 226 in absence of arbitrariness or public interest violation.
17 Oct 2006The petitioners, claiming to be public-spirited citizens, filed a writ petition in public interest challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtr...
- 79
