Search Results for "reassessment order"

734 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 734 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion on Already Disclosed Loan Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Jainam Investments, a partnership firm engaged in trading of shares and securities, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Income-Tax Officer's Appeal, Affirming That Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 Could Not Be Issued as Right to Reopen Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922 Was Barred. Section 297(2)(d)(ii) of 1961 Act Does Not Revive Time-Barred Reassessment Powers.

The case involved an income-tax reassessment dispute arising under the Income-tax Act, 1922 and the Income-tax Act, 1961. The respondent, an assessee,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Validity of Reassessment Notices Issued Under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Core Contention Revolves Around Limitation Period and Applicability of Section 150 in Light of Tribunal Order Quashing Original Assessment.

The writ petitions were filed by LTIMindtree Limited, a public limited company engaged in software development and export, challenging reassessment pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Proper Opportunity to Respond Renders Assessment Order a Nullity.

The petitioner, Madhuri Sameer Gokhale, an individual homemaker, challenged the reassessment order dated 29 March 2022 passed by the National Faceless...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Provision for Unascertained Liabilities is Invalid.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016, declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Order in KVAT Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Assessee Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Third Party. Section 39(1) Reassessment Set Aside as Assessing Authority Relied on Ex-Parte Statements Without Providing Opportunity to Rebut.

The petitioner, M/s. TTP Technologies Pvt. Ltd., a registered company represented by its Director Sri. M. Devarajaiah, filed writ petitions under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Full and True Disclosure.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016 declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25,...