Search Results for "panchayat president"

513 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 513 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court examines legality of appointing persons with criminal background as Ministers. Interpretation of Articles 75 and 164 of the Constitution to uphold democratic integrity and combat criminalisation of politics.

The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed as a public interest litigation by the petitioner, Manoj Narula, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeal Against Single Judge's Dismissal of Petition on Extension of Tenure of Raichur Municipal Councillors. Appeal Focuses on Interpretation of Section 503 of Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act and Exclusion of Administrator Period from Five-Year Term.

The writ appeal arose from the dismissal of W.P.No.202910/2025 by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka, which had been filed by 23 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Panchayat President and Vice President — Requirement of Prior Notice Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Held Directory. Motion Valid as Substantially Complied With.

The petitioners, Mrs. Malathi B Acharya (President) and Mr. Chandrashekar (Vice President) of Bommarabettu Village Panchayat, challenged the no-confid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notification and Election Notice for Town Panchayat President and Vice-President Posts Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42A of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964. Court holds that provisional notification and public hearing are mandatory before final reservation of posts.

The petitioner, B.N. Srinivas, challenged the legality of a notification dated 13.03.2017 issued by the State of Karnataka and an election notice date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Adhyaksha for Violation of Mandatory Debate Requirement. Failure to Allow Debate Under Rule 3(3) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayat) Rules, 1994 Renders Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, H.N. Nagaveni, was elected as Adhyaksha (President) of Palagatti Grama Panchayat on 17.12.2012. On 21.12.2013, 15 members of the Panch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Councillor for Defection Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986 — Failure to Prove Merger of Original Political Party Results in Confirmation of Disqualification Order.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by councillors of the Municipal Council, Sonpeth, challenging their disqualification under the Maharashtra ...