Search Results for "duty paid"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "duty paid"

6693 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6693 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest from expiry of three months from date of refund application till actual refund.

21 May 2021

The petitioner, Qualcomm India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged in providing support services to its ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of VAT on Pan Masala Containing Tobacco under MVAT Act, 2002. Exemption Under Schedule Entry A-45 Upheld and Part Payment Orders Quashed as Explanation Inserted by Notification dated 21.01.2006 Held Ultra Vires.

4 Oct 2016

The dispute arose under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 regarding the levy of VAT on pan masala containing tobacco (gutkha/mawa) for the fin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reduces Penalty in Stamp Duty Dispute for Deed of Assent Treated as Gift Deed. Collector's Imposition of Maximum Ten-Times Penalty Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning and Discretionary Exercise.

21 Aug 2020

The case involves a dispute over stamp duty and penalty imposed on a Deed of Assent executed by the Trustees of H.C. Dhanda Trust. Late Shri Harish Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Orders in Customs Duty Under-Invoicing Case. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Settlement Application Upheld as Proper Exercise of Discretion Under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962.

27 Jul 2010

The petitioner, M/s Paul Industries, imported electronic goods during 1995-96 and was issued a show cause notice on 11th June 1999 by the Directorate ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B(1) Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) is distinct from the manufacturer's right, and the benefit of the second proviso (waiver of limitation for duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Return of Security Deposit with Interest in Customs Duty Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.10 Crores with 18% Interest After CESTAT Set Aside Confiscation Order. The Court held that once proceedings are finalized in favour of the importer, the revenue cannot retain the security deposit and must return it with interest from the date of deposit under the Customs Act, 1962.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, M/s Pride Foramer, a company engaged in offshore oil exploration, imported a rig 'Pride Pensylvania' for a contract with ONGC. On 15 M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claim for Exported Biscuits Despite Exemption Notification — Revenue Cannot Retain Duty Paid Without Authority of Law. The court held that exemption notification No.3/2006-CE is not applicable to exported goods as retail sale price in rupees is not required on export packages, and duty paid is validly claimable as rebate under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

21 Oct 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Parle Products Ltd., is a company engaged in manufacturing biscuits and confectioneries. Biscuits are excisable goods under Secti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Penalty Under Maharashtra Stamp Act for Delayed Payment. Court Analyses Effect of Interim Stay on Demand Date Under Section 31(4).

18 Jun 2025

The petitioner, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging demand n...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal on Limitation Issue — Show Cause Notice Held Time-Barred. The relevant date for computing limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 for recovery of duty in case of provisional assessment is the date of refund order or refund cheque, not the date of credit into government treasury.

1 Mar 2006

The appellant, M/s Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Limited, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order of the Customs, ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)