Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest from expiry of three months from date of refund application till actual refund.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Qualcomm India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged in providing support services to its foreign affiliates, which qualified as export of services under the Finance Act, 1994. Since no service tax was paid on exported output services, the petitioner accumulated CENVAT credit on input services. Under rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, the petitioner was entitled to claim refund of unutilized credit. Between June 2009 and December 2014, the petitioner filed 19 refund applications for various periods from June 2008 to December 2014, totaling substantial amounts. The refunds were sanctioned and paid by the respondents, but after considerable delays. The petitioner sought interest on the delayed refunds under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The respondents contended that interest was not payable because the refunds were not sanctioned beyond the stipulated period or because the petitioner had not made a specific claim for interest. The court analyzed the provisions of section 11BB, which mandates that if any duty ordered to be refunded is not refunded within three months from the date of receipt of the application, the applicant is entitled to interest at the prescribed rate from the date immediately after the expiry of three months until the date of refund. The court held that the provision is mandatory and does not require a separate application for interest. The court rejected the respondents' argument that the refund applications were incomplete or that the delay was attributable to the petitioner. The court directed the respondents to pay interest on the refund amounts from the expiry of three months from the respective dates of the refund applications until the date of actual refund, at the rate prescribed under section 11BB. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Service Tax - Refund of CENVAT Credit - Interest on Delayed Refund - Section 11BB Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 Finance Act, 1994 - Petitioner claimed refund of unutilized CENVAT credit on input services used for exported output services - Refund applications were filed between 2009 and 2014 but refunds were granted after considerable delay - Court held that interest under section 11BB is payable from the expiry of three months from the date of receipt of the refund application till the date of actual refund - The provision is mandatory and does not require a prior demand or application for interest - Held that the department is liable to pay interest automatically on delayed refunds (Paras 1-17).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on delayed refund of CENVAT credit under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, and from which date such interest is payable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Respondents directed to pay interest on the refund amounts from the expiry of three months from the respective dates of the refund applications until the date of actual refund, at the rate prescribed under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Interest on delayed refund
  • Section 11BB Central Excise Act
  • 1944
  • Section 83 Finance Act
  • 1994
  • CENVAT Credit Rules
  • 2004
  • Rule 5
  • Export of services
  • Refund of unutilized CENVAT credit
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (05) 29

WRIT PETITION NO.1775 OF 2020

2021-05-21

Ujjal Bhuyan, Milind N. Jadhav

Prakash Shah, Arun Jain, Jas Sanghvi, Sham Walve, Ram Ochani

Qualcomm India Private Limited

Union of India and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to grant interest on delayed refund of CENVAT credit.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to forthwith grant and sanction interest on the refund amount after expiry of three months from the respective dates of application till the date of actual refund under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Filing Reason

Delay in sanctioning refund of unutilized CENVAT credit on input services used for exported output services, and failure to pay interest on the delayed refund.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on delayed refund of CENVAT credit under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. From which date such interest is payable.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that refund applications were filed between 2009 and 2014, but refunds were granted after considerable delay, and interest under section 11BB is mandatory and payable automatically from the expiry of three months from the date of application. Respondents contended that interest is not payable because refunds were sanctioned within the stipulated period or because the petitioner did not make a specific claim for interest, and that the delay was attributable to the petitioner for not providing complete documents.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 mandates payment of interest on delayed refunds automatically from the expiry of three months from the date of receipt of the refund application until the date of actual refund, without requiring a separate application or demand for interest. The provision is mandatory and applies to refunds of CENVAT credit under the Finance Act, 1994 by virtue of section 83.

Judgment Excerpts

By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to forthwith grant and sanction interest on the refund amount after expiry of three months from the respective dates of application till the date of actual refund under section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed 19 refund applications between June 2009 and December 2014 for periods from June 2008 to December 2014. Refunds were sanctioned and paid after delays. Petitioner filed writ petition in 2020 seeking interest on delayed refunds. Heard on January 12, 2021, and judgment pronounced on May 21, 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Excise Act, 1944: Section 11BB
  • Finance Act, 1994: Section 83
  • CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004: Rule 3, Rule 5
  • Service Tax Rules, 1994: Rule 6A
  • Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012: Rule 3
  • Export of Service Rules, 2006:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Second Departmental Enquiry Against RPF ASI for Same Misconduct — Double Jeopardy Principle Under Article 20(2) of Constitution and Rule 219.4(b) of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 Bars Re-prosecution After Final Puni...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest from expiry of three months from date of refund application till actual refund.