KAHC010044762015_1
7 Mar 2017...
Search Results for "administrative circulars"
544 result(s) found
Found 544 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.
28 Feb 2006Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Implementation of Government Resolutions for Regularisation of Surplus Vacant Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Entitled to Benefit of Policy Despite Earlier Exemption Order. Court Directs Respondents to Raise Demand for Premium and Upon Payment, Relieve Petitioner of Exemption Conditions.
30 Mar 2023The petitioners, Salim Alimahomed Porbanderwalla (owner of land CTS Nos. 124 and 125, Village Marol, Andheri, measuring about 17492.70 sq mtrs) and Sh...
- 79
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Appointment of Technical Assistants in Public Works Department — Selection Process Found Vitiated by Arbitrariness and Non-Compliance with Recruitment Rules. The court quashed the appointments and directed a fresh selection process, holding that the recruitment must strictly follow the prescribed Recruitment Rules and principles of natural justice.
11 Sep 2025The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by individuals challenging the appointment of Technical Assistants (CEIT) in the Public Works...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Municipal Employee Before Age 58 — Violation of Service Regulations. Compulsory retirement at age 55 without following Regulation 25(3) of BMC Service Regulations, 1989 set aside as arbitrary and illegal.
7 May 2026The Petitioner, Smt. Yashoda Bapu Jadhav, was an employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC). She was compulsorily retired at the ag...
- 239
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Transfer of Writ Petitions and Contempt Petition from Aurangabad Bench to Principal Seat Under Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960. Legality of Chief Justice's Administrative Transfer Orders and Validity of Proviso to Rule 2 of Chapter XXXI Raised.
11 Dec 2014The Bombay High Court heard three writ petitions filed by the Lawyers' Forum for General Utility & Litigating Public, Aurangabad, challenging the admi...
- 55
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Power Corporation Challenging Quashing of Transfer Orders — Transfer Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Transfer Policy and Lack of Administrative Exigency. The court upheld the Single Judge's order quashing the transfers as arbitrary and in violation of the transfer policy.
12 Sep 2024The present appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, was filed by the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (appellant...
- 184
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Second Appeal in Primary Teacher Recruitment Dispute — Civil Court Jurisdiction Upheld. Court holds that civil court has jurisdiction to direct appointment in a particular cadre and that circulars for additional marks apply, but the plaintiff was not entitled to additional marks as she did not possess the required qualification.
25 Feb 2026The case involves a second appeal by the District Primary Education Officer and another against the judgment and decree of the trial court and appella...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Scheme of Amalgamation Without Physical Meeting in Exceptional Circumstances. Section 110 of Companies Act, 2013 Does Not Eliminate Requirement of Meeting Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956 for Scheme Approval.
8 May 2014The judgment addresses a Company Summons for Direction filed by Godrej Industries Limited (GIL) seeking approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation with Wada...
- 193
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Reversion of Executive Officers — Petitioners Failed to Establish Legal Right to Continue in Promotional Posts After Cadre Reorganization.
29 Oct 2018The petitioners, who were working as Executive Officers in various Taluk Panchayats on an ad-hoc basis, challenged the order of the Karnataka State Ad...
- 96
