Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Implementation of Government Resolutions for Regularisation of Surplus Vacant Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Entitled to Benefit of Policy Despite Earlier Exemption Order. Court Directs Respondents to Raise Demand for Premium and Upon Payment, Relieve Petitioner of Exemption Conditions.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Salim Alimahomed Porbanderwalla (owner of land CTS Nos. 124 and 125, Village Marol, Andheri, measuring about 17492.70 sq mtrs) and Shivranjani Properties LLP (developer), filed a writ petition seeking implementation of Government Resolutions dated 1st August 2019 and 23rd June 2021. The background is that on 15th May 2008, the Additional Collector and Competent Authority under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (ULC Act) passed an order exempting the surplus vacant land from Chapter III of the ULC Act, subject to certain conditions. Subsequently, the State issued Government Resolutions providing a scheme for regularisation of such surplus land by payment of a premium, which would relieve the owner of the conditions of the exemption order. The petitioners applied for the benefit of these resolutions, but the respondents (State of Maharashtra and Additional Collector) failed to act, and instead issued a letter dated 22nd April 2022 which the petitioners sought to quash. The court examined the resolutions and found that the petitioners were entitled to the benefit. The court directed the respondents to raise a demand for premium as per the resolutions, and upon payment, to relieve the petitioners of all terms and conditions of the exemption order dated 15th May 2008. The petition was allowed in those terms.

Headnote

A) Urban Land Ceiling - Regularisation of Surplus Land - Government Resolution Policy - Sections 20, 21 Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Petitioners sought implementation of Government Resolutions dated 1st August 2019 and 23rd June 2021 for regularisation of surplus vacant land, which allowed owners to pay a premium and be relieved of conditions of earlier exemption orders - The court held that the policy applied to the petitioners' case and directed the respondents to raise a demand for premium and upon payment, relieve the petitioners of the terms of the exemption order dated 15th May 2008 (Paras 1-24).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of Government Resolutions dated 1st August 2019 and 23rd June 2021 for regularisation of surplus vacant land, and whether the respondents are obliged to implement those resolutions and raise a demand for premium in lieu of the earlier exemption order dated 15th May 2008.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to implement the Government Resolutions dated 1st August 2019 and 23rd June 2021, raise a demand for premium in respect of the surplus vacant land, and upon payment of such demand, relieve the petitioners of all terms and conditions of the exemption order dated 15th May 2008. The letter dated 22nd April 2022 was quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Government Resolution policy
  • regularisation of surplus vacant land
  • Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act 1976
  • exemption order
  • demand for premium
  • implementation of policy decision
  • writ of mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (03) 30

WRIT PETITION NO. 4849 OF 2022

2023-03-30

G.S. Patel, Neela Gokhale

2023:BHC-OS:2190-DB

Mr Pravin Samdani, Senior Advocate, with Amogh Singh, Nivit Srivastava & Sneha Patil, i/b Maniar Srivastava Associates; Mr Himanshu Takke, AGP

Salim Alimahomed Porbanderwalla & Anr

The State of Maharashtra & Anr

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking implementation of Government Resolutions for regularisation of surplus vacant land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to implement Government Resolutions dated 1st August 2019 and 23rd June 2021, raise demand for premium, and relieve petitioners of conditions of exemption order dated 15th May 2008; also sought quashing of letter dated 22nd April 2022.

Filing Reason

Respondents failed to implement the Government Resolutions and issued a letter dated 22nd April 2022 which the petitioners considered contrary to the policy.

Previous Decisions

An exemption order dated 15th May 2008 was passed by the Additional Collector and Competent Authority under the ULC Act exempting surplus vacant land from Chapter III of the Act.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of Government Resolutions dated 1st August 2019 and 23rd June 2021 for regularisation of surplus vacant land. Whether the respondents are obliged to implement the resolutions and raise a demand for premium.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the Government Resolutions provide a scheme for regularisation of surplus land by payment of premium, and they are entitled to the benefit. Respondents did not oppose the petition; the court noted that the respondents had not implemented the resolutions.

Ratio Decidendi

The Government Resolutions dated 1st August 2019 and 23rd June 2021 constitute a policy decision for regularisation of surplus vacant land under the ULC Act, and owners who have obtained exemption orders are entitled to the benefit of the scheme by paying a premium, thereby being relieved of the conditions of the exemption order.

Judgment Excerpts

The 1st Petitioner owns lands CTS Nos. 124 and 125 of Village Marol, Taluka Andheri. It all began on 15th May 2008 when the Additional Collector and competent authority under the Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act 1976 passed an order exempting surplus vacant lands from the application of Chapter III of the ULC Act. Prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the Petition at pages 24 and 25 read...

Procedural History

The petition was filed on an unspecified date. On 30th March 2023, the court heard the matter and delivered the oral judgment. Rule was issued and made returnable forthwith.

Acts & Sections

  • Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976: Chapter III, Sections 20, 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry and Absence of Proximate Cause of Death. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or abetment to suic...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Implementation of Government Resolutions for Regularisation of Surplus Vacant Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Entitled to Benefit of Policy Despite Earlier Exemption Order. Court Directs Respondents to...