Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010044762015_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-24 21:35:12
  • 96
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010044762015_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (03) 5

Writ Petition No.36702/2015 (S-RES) connected with W.P. Nos.43903/2015, 37637/2015, 37638/2015, 37640/2015, 37759/2015, 39873/2015, 45559/2015, 47115/2015, 47116/2015

2017-03-07

Raghvendra S. Chauhan

K. Shashi Kiran Shetty (Senior Advocate) for Ms. Farah Fathima; Lt. Col. S. S. Dagar (Party-in-Person); Prabhuling K. Navadgi (Additional Solicitor General of India) with H. Jayakara Shetty (CGC) for respondents; Mohammed Akhil; Pavan G. N.

Lt Col D. S. Choudhary, Lt. Col. S. S. Dagar, Col Kshitij Srivastava, Col B. K. Kullolli, Lt Col V.K.S. Tomar, Col Sunil Rana, Col A. Ramakrishnan

Union of India, Chief of Army Staff, Quarter Master General, Director General (Land Work Estate/Policy (Quarter)), General Officer Commanding Karnataka and Kerala Sub Area, Station Commander & Estate Officer, Administration Commandant, Col Manish Sinha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Army's policy on vacation of married quarters.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners (serving Army officers) sought to quash the policy dated 30.01.2015 and communication dated 16.04.2015 as arbitrary and illegal.

Filing Reason

Policy was alleged to be contrary to Special Army Order SAO 10/S/86 and Para 1025 of Defence Service Regulations 1986.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: 226, 227
  • Defence Service Regulations for the Army, 1987: Para 1025
  • Special Army Order SAO 10/S/86: Provision of Accommodation and Allied Services and Recovery of Quartering Charges from Service Officers
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
married quarters vacation army accommodation policy writ petition arbitrariness SAO 10/S/86 Defence Service Regulations para 1025

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Civil Procedure Appeal Due to High Court's Improper Merits Review Under Order 41 Rule 17 CPC. High Court Cannot Dismiss Appeal on Merits While Dismissing in Default Under Explanation to Order 41 Rule 17(1) CPC. 2026-09-17 03:41:03
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Employees Compensation Act Case — 68% Physical Disability of Driver Amounts to 100% Loss of Earning Capacity. The court held that when a driver is certified with 68% physical disability and declared unfit to drive... 2026-09-17 03:40:46
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder Compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 Land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?