Search Results for "Mumbai Port Trust"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Challenge to Labour Court and Gratuity Proceedings. Ex-Manager's Claims Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act and Payment of Gratuity Act Dismissed as Society is Neither an 'Industry' Nor an 'Establishment'.

The Petitioner, Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is a cooperative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses NSE's Defamation Suit Against Journalists, Upholds Freedom of Speech in Public Interest Reporting. Court holds that a public body like NSE must establish 'special damage' for defamation injunction and that fair comment on matters of public interest is protected.

The National Stock Exchange (NSE) filed a defamation suit against Moneylife Media Private Limited, Sucheta Dalal, and Debashish Basu, seeking an injun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Building Declared Dilapidated — Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Procedure Under MMC Act Before Demolition. Tenants' Right to Hearing Upheld Under Sections 354 and 488 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The petitioners, eleven tenants residing in a building called Habib Terrace in Kurla, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitrator's Awards in Charterparty Dispute. Court Confirms That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach of Contract and Damages Are Not Open to Reappraisal Under Section 34.

The Petitioner, Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (RCF), a public sector company, entered into an Agreement of Affreightment with the Respondent,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...