Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Building Declared Dilapidated — Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Procedure Under MMC Act Before Demolition. Tenants' Right to Hearing Upheld Under Sections 354 and 488 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, eleven tenants residing in a building called Habib Terrace in Kurla, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) declaring the building as dilapidated and dangerous and directing its demolition. The petitioners contended that the notice was issued without giving them any opportunity of hearing, in violation of principles of natural justice and the procedure prescribed under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. They argued that they had been residing in the building for decades and had no alternative accommodation. The respondents, including MCGM and the owners of the building, opposed the petition, stating that the building was in a dilapidated condition and posed a risk to life and property. The court examined the provisions of Sections 354 and 488 of the MMC Act, which require the Corporation to give notice to the owner and occupiers before demolition and to consider their objections. The court held that the impugned notice was issued without following the due process of law and without affording the tenants a hearing. The court set aside the notice and directed the MCGM to hear the petitioners before taking any further action. The court also observed that the tenants' right to shelter is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution and cannot be taken away without following the procedure established by law.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Demolition of Dilapidated Building - Right of Tenants to be Heard - Sections 354, 488 Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Petitioners, tenants of a building declared dilapidated, challenged the demolition notice issued by MCGM without affording them an opportunity of hearing - Court held that the Corporation must follow the procedure under Section 354 and give notice to the occupiers before demolition, and that the tenants have a right to be heard - Held that the impugned notice was set aside and the Corporation was directed to hear the petitioners before taking any further action (Paras 1-22).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Municipal Corporation can demolish a building declared dilapidated without giving notice and hearing to the tenants?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned notice, and directed the Municipal Corporation to hear the petitioners before taking any further action regarding demolition.

Law Points

  • Right to hearing before demolition
  • Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act
  • 1888
  • Section 488 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act
  • Natural justice
  • Demolition of dilapidated building
  • Tenants' rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (10) 90

Writ Petition (Lodging) No. 2371 of 2014

2014-10-16

Mr. Nitesh Acharya with Mr. Altaf Khan and Mr. Tanveer Nizam i/by Khan Mohd. Yousuf and Ponjatom for the petitioners; Mrs. Vandana Mahadik for respondents 1 and 2/MCGM; Mr. R. J. Mane, AGP for Respondent No.3/State; Mr. Virendra T. Dubey for Respondents 4 and 5.

Mr. Zubair Malik and others

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging demolition notice issued by Municipal Corporation

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the demolition notice and direction to the Corporation to follow procedure before demolition

Filing Reason

The Municipal Corporation issued a notice declaring the building as dilapidated and dangerous without giving the tenants an opportunity of hearing

Issues

Whether the demolition notice issued by MCGM without hearing the tenants is valid? Whether the tenants have a right to be heard before demolition of a building declared dilapidated?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the notice was issued without following the procedure under Sections 354 and 488 of the MMC Act and without affording them a hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents argued that the building was in a dilapidated condition and posed a risk to life and property, and that the Corporation had the power to demolish it.

Ratio Decidendi

The Municipal Corporation must follow the procedure under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and give notice to the occupiers before demolition, and the tenants have a right to be heard in accordance with principles of natural justice.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned notice is set aside. The Corporation is directed to hear the petitioners before taking any further action.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay challenging a demolition notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 16 October 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888: 354, 488
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXVII Rule 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prohibitory Order Under Regulation 21 of CHALR, 2004 — No Appeal Lies to CESTAT. Regulation 22(8) of CHALR, 2004 is Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Building Declared Dilapidated — Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Procedure Under MMC Act Before Demolition. Tenants' Right to Hearing Upheld Under Sections 354 and 488 of Mumb...