Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order Quashing Lokayukta Investigation. Court holds that Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 does not require prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC for investigation of public servants.

The petitioner, Dadapeer Bhanuvalli, an Assistant Public Prosecutor, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 27.09.2021 passed by the Karnat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Multiple Petitions for Arbitrator Appointment in BBMP Contract Disputes. Petitioners Seek Independent Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act for Claims Under Clause 10 of Agreement Dated 15.03.2007.

The matter involves multiple Civil Miscellaneous Petitions (CMP) filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitrati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Compulsory Retirement in Disciplinary Proceeding Despite Criminal Acquittal. Disciplinary Authority's Finding of Misconduct Upheld as Independent of Criminal Trial Outcome Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Karnataka High Court which set aside a compulsory retirement order imposed on a Village Accountant following ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010068412019_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...