Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC010068412019_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-03 08:14:58
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010068412019_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (08) 27

Writ Petition Nos. 10601/2019 c/w 54573/2018, 5048/2019, 5046/2019, 5047/2019, 35452/2018, 2058/2019, 54223/2018, 40711/2018, 5539/2019, 15503/2019, 16563/2019, 16565/2019, 22899/2019, 22900/2019, 22901/2019, 56322/2018, 1222/2019, 1228/2019, 4377/2019, 57812/2018, 5522/2019, 11817/2019, 16431/2019, 2452/2019, 35450/2018, 35451/2018, 49973/2018, 52910/2018, 53505/2018 & 11155-57/2019, 107/2019, 674/2019, 1154-1155/2019, 1187/2019, 2076/2019, 2193/2019 & 5383/2019, 2194/2019, 2373/2019, 2854/2019, 2987/2019, 2988/2019, 2989/2019, 2990/2019, 2992/2019, 3477/2019, 3478/2019, 3479/2019, 3495/2019, 4145/2019, 4459/2019, 4600/2019, 5815/2019, 5816/2019, 6422/2019, 7810/2019, 8141/2019, 8263/2019, 8264/2019, 10445/2019, 10602/2019, 10608/2019, 10631/2019, 10632/2019, 10633/2019, 10670/2019, 11158/2019, 11160/2019, 11452/2019, 11453/2019, 11454/2019, 11455/2019, 12249/2019, 12678/2019, 14091/2019, 14093/2019, 14402/2019, 14403/2019, 14404/2019, 15541/2019, 15906/2019, 16430/2019, 16432/2019, 19358/2019, 20091/2019, 20093-20094/2019, 22366/2019, 22369/2019, 22370/2019, 22385/2019, 22891/2019, 23107/2019, 23108/2019, 2991/2019, 20689/2019 and 38427/2018 (GM-MM-S)

2019-08-16

Abhay S. Oka, P.S. Dinesh Kumar

R.G. Kolle, M. Keshava Reddy, Vikram Huilgol, V.G. Bhanuprakash, K.M. Chandrashekar (party-in-person), Ganapathy Bhat Vajralli, Prakash B.S.

K. Thirumalesh, H. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, K. Ratna, N.T. Rama Reddy, S.T. Asha, M/S Sri Ranga Granites, N. Suhas, M. Suresh

State of Karnataka, The Secretary to Govt., Dept of Commerce & Industries, The Director of Mines & Geology, The Deputy Director (Mines) & Competent Authority, The Deputy Conservator of Forests, The Deputy Commissioner & Chairman, District Task Force (Mines) Committee

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking directions for grant of quarry lease for ordinary building stone and/or to quash endorsements rejecting such applications and for a declaration that pending applications are saved under amended Rule 8-B of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016 and are to be processed under the un-amended provisions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought various reliefs including: (i) direction to grant quarry lease in government land; (ii) quashing of endorsements rejecting their applications; (iii) declaration that their applications are saved under the amended rules and should be processed under pre-amendment rules.

Filing Reason

Applications for quarry lease/licence were either not processed or were rejected by authorities based on the amended provisions of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016, prompting the petitioners to approach the court.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
quarry lease ordinary building stone Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016 Article 226 Article 227 endorsement quashing

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court KAHC010068412019_1 2026-08-03 08:14:58
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Supervisor's Income Assessed at Rs.4,500 per Month, Multiplier of 18 Applied, Future Prospects Added. Claimants Awarded Rs.10,90,600 with Interest at... 2026-08-03 08:14:58
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation burden of proof limitation benefit of doubt Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?