Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders Allowing Writ Petitions by Lessees in...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Supervisor Appoin...

HomeJudgement

Scroll Down To Discover

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Concerning Denial of Waiver Benefits under Karasamadhana Scheme, 2017. Petitioners challenged endorsements rejecting claims for waiver of penalty and interest under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU

Admin

2026-09-14 15:24:17

Font size:

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010078052017_1

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (11) 6

W.P.No.33176/2017 c/w W.P.No.32658/2017, W.P.Nos.32659-670/2017, W.P.Nos.33470-472/2017, W.P.No.35892/2017, W.P.Nos.25349/2017 & 31438-448/2017, W.P.Nos.25350/2017 & 30508-518/2017, W.P.Nos.25351/2017 & 30526-536/2017, W.P.Nos.25352/2017 & 34098-108/2017, W.P.No.32127/2017, W.P.Nos.25353/2017 & 30711-721/2017, W.P.Nos.25354/2017 & 30318-328/2017, W.P.No.30001/2017, W.P.No.28370/2017, W.P.No.26333/2017, W.P.No.38574/2017, W.P.No.44681/2017, W.P.No.45976/2017, W.P.No.45978/2017, W.P.No.46691/2017 & W.P.No.47080/2017 (T-RES)

2017-11-14

Vineet Kothari

Sri. Tarun Gulati, Sri. Kishore Kunal, Sri. Arun Sri Kumar, Sri. Mohammed Mujassim, Sri. Ganesh S., Sri. Thirumalesh M., Sri. Udaya Holla, Sri. J.P. Singh, Sri. Chethana K.N., Sri. K.M. Shivayogiswamy; for Respondents: Sri. Aditya Sondhi, Addl. Advocate General, Sri. Vikram Huligol, HCGP

M/s. WS Retail Services Private Limited & Others

The State of Karnataka & Others

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging endorsements denying benefit under Karasamadhana Scheme, 2017 for waiver of penalty and interest under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

Remedy Sought

To declare the impugned orders and endorsements as null and void and to direct the respondents to grant the benefit of the Karasamadhana Scheme.

Filing Reason

Respondents denied the benefit of waiver of penalty and interest under the Karasamadhana Scheme, 2017.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of Karasamadhana Scheme, 2017 for waiver of penalty and interest under KVAT and CST Acts.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed and are being heard together before the High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003:
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956:
Karasamadhana Scheme, 2017:

One-Time Download (₹149 ₹99) Get Subscription

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Married Daughter's Claim for Railway Quarter Regularization in Gender Discrimination Case. Railway Board Circular Dated 11.8.1992 Read Down Under Article 14 of Constitution of India to Include Married Daughter as Eligible if Rai... 2026-09-18 20:04:14

High Court High Court Modifies Single Judge’s Order in Chit Fund Payment Dispute Under Tamil Nadu Chit Fund Act. Direction to Pay Principal Balance Modified to Allow Rule of Appropriation, Payment Made Subject to Outcome of Pending Statutory Appeals Under Sec... 2026-09-18 20:04:05

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Concerning Denial of Waiver Benefits under Karasamadhana Scheme, 2017. Petitioners challenged endorsements rejecting claims for waiver of penalty and interest under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

Issue of Consideration

Case Details

Nature of Litigation

Remedy Sought

Filing Reason

Issues

Procedural History

Acts & Sections

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 11 Arbitration Application for Appointment of Arbitrato...

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Central Excise Refund Interest Dispute Under Section ...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders Allowing Writ Petitions by Lessees in Land Encr...

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Supervisor Appointment for ...

Supreme Court Upholds Plaintiff in Specific Performance Suit Under Specific Relief Act, 19...

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Appeal — Sets Aside NCL...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...