Case Note & Summary
The matter involves multiple Civil Miscellaneous Petitions (CMP) filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners are individuals who entered into an agreement dated 15-03-2007 with the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) for various works identified by package numbers. Disputes arose regarding claims preferred by the petitioners on various dates in 2009, 2010, and 2011. Clause 10 of the agreement provided for arbitration. The petitioners sought the court's intervention to appoint an independent arbitrator to resolve the claims. The petitions were heard together by a single judge. However, the provided text does not include any further factual background, arguments, court analysis, or final decision; it only lists the parties, advocates, and the prayer for appointment of an arbitrator. No judgment or order is excerpted.
Headnote
A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11(5) and (6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Petitions filed seeking appointment of independent arbitrator under Clause 10 of agreement dated 15-03-2007 - No final decision, reasoning, or paragraph references available in the provided text.
Issue of Consideration
Whether an independent arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate claims arising under Clause 10 of the agreement dated 15-03-2007
Law Points
- Arbitration clause invoked for appointment of arbitrator under Section 11(5) and (6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
- 1996
