High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, inserted by the Finance Act, 2012. The lead petitioner is M/s. Lakshminirman Bangalore Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Managing Director Sri G R Suresh. Other petitioners include various individuals, partnerships, and companies. The respondents are the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Centralized Processing Cell-TDS, Ghaziabad) and the Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Revenue. The provision imposes a fee for late filing of TDS statements. Petitioners contended that Section 234E is arbitrary, discriminatory, unreasonable, and ultra vires the Constitution, violating Articles 14, 265, and 277. They sought a declaration that the provision is unconstitutional and void, and for quashing of proceedings initiated thereunder. The matter was heard by Justice Aravind Kumar on June 12, 2015. The text of the judgment provided does not include the court's reasoning, findings, or final order.

Issue of Consideration

Whether Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is unconstitutional and violative of fundamental rights

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (06) 26

W.P. No. 26589/2014 c/w W.P. Nos. 3476-3479/2014 & 5661-5665/2014, 3725/2014 & 9922-9923/2014, 6918-6938/2014, 11889-11890/2014, 12097-12121/2014, 13065-13074/2014, 14294-14295/2014 & 30565-30567/2014, 14296-14297/2014 & 29363-29365/2014, 14669/2014 & 15513-15514/2014, 16939-16950/2014, 18788-18791/2014 & 18792/2014, 19398-19399/2014, 19407-19421/2014, 19762-19775/2014, 23541-23549/2014, 25841-25848/2014, 26586-26587/2014, 26588/2014, 10243/2014 & 11891-11894/2014, 15476/2014 & 16111-16113/2014, 24023/2014, 46360/2014, 41614-41617/2014, 41618/2014, 38130-38134/2014, 53286-53289/2014 & 53290-53291/2014, 38127-38129/2014 AND 37689/2014 & 5641-5658/2015 (T-IT)

2015-06-12

Justice Aravind Kumar

S. Parthasarathi, P. Dinesh, Jinita Chatterjee, Rama Murthy R, Chythanya K.K., S.R. Shiva Prakash, K.V. Aravind

M/s. Lakshminirman Bangalore Pvt. Ltd and others

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Centralized Processing Cell-TDS, Ghaziabad and Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to constitutional validity of Section 234E of Income Tax Act, 1961 which imposes a fee for late filing of TDS returns.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought declaration that Section 234E is unconstitutional and ultra vires, and to quash proceedings initiated thereunder.

Filing Reason

Petitioners contended that the provision is arbitrary, discriminatory, and violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277 of the Constitution.

Issues

Whether Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the Constitution of India? Whether the impugned provision violates Article 14 of the Constitution? Whether the provision is violative of Articles 265 and 277?

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka. No prior proceedings are mentioned in the provided text.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 234E
  • Constitution of India: Article 14, 226, 227, 265, 277
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Affirming Removal of Mathadhipathi under A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987. Leave granted in SLP against dismissal of challenge to removal based on ...