Search Results for "Bombay Town Planning Act"

1134 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1134 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice under MRTP Act. Demolition Notice Quashed as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice issued by the Municipal Council, Kinwat, under Section 52 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Part in Development Charge Levy Dispute. Development Charge on Already Developed Land Held Illegal Under Section 124 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Sir Gangadharrao Chitnavis Memorial Medical Research Trust, a charitable trust, owned Plot No. 56 at Temple Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Heard PIL Challenging Development Permissions for Star Hotel in No Development Zone. The Court Considered Whether UDD Approval Under Regulation 59(3) and Additional FSI of 1.0 Were Valid Under DCRs and MRTP Act.

The case arose from a public interest litigation filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Power of Municipal Commissioner to Revoke Occupancy Certificate in Challenge by Co-operative Society and Developer. Core Issue: Whether Municipal Commissioner Had Authority to Cancel Occupancy Certificate Granted Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The writ petition was filed by M/s. Satra Plaza Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., a cooperative society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Garden and Playground in Development Plan. Land Reserved Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Delay or Change of Purpose Once Acquisition Proceedings Are Initiated.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Abhijit Chandrakant Chaunda and Chandrashekhar Mallikarjunappa Bidve challenging the acquisition of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notification for Growth Center in Waluj Notified Area.

Four writ petitions were filed challenging the acquisition proceedings initiated by a notification dated 1st December 2010 under Section 126(4) of the...