Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice under MRTP Act. Demolition Notice Quashed as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice issued by the Municipal Council, Kinwat, under Section 52 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The notice directed the petitioners to demolish certain structures on their property within 24 hours. The petitioners contended that the notice was issued without any prior show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The respondents argued that the notice was valid and in accordance with law. The court, after hearing the parties, held that the demolition notice was unsustainable as it was issued without affording the petitioners an opportunity of being heard. The court emphasized that the principles of natural justice are fundamental and must be followed before any adverse action is taken. The court quashed the notice and directed the respondents to follow the proper procedure under the MRTP Act if they wished to proceed further. The writ petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Demolition Notice - Natural Justice - Section 52 Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - The court considered whether a demolition notice under Section 52 of the MRTP Act could be issued without affording the affected party an opportunity of hearing. Held that the principles of natural justice require that before any adverse action is taken, the person likely to be affected must be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The notice was quashed as it was issued without any show cause notice or hearing. (Paras 1-5)

B) Town Planning - Section 52 MRTP Act - Compliance with Statutory Procedure - The court examined the requirement of following the procedure under Section 52 of the MRTP Act before ordering demolition. Held that the authority must strictly comply with the statutory provisions, including issuing a notice and considering objections. The impugned notice was set aside for non-compliance. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the demolition notice issued under Section 52 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned demolition notice is quashed and set aside. The respondents are at liberty to proceed in accordance with law after following the proper procedure under the MRTP Act.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Section 52 Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act
  • 1966
  • Demolition notice
  • Show cause notice
  • Opportunity of hearing
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (01) 11

Writ Petition No.11677 of 2017

2020-01-24

Prasanna B. Varale, R.G. Avachat

Mr.U.B.Bilolikar for petitioners, Mr.S.B.Yawalkar AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3, Mr.B.A.Darak for respondent no.4

Kiran s/o. Govindrao Tirmanwar and others

The State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a demolition notice issued under Section 52 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the demolition notice and direction to follow proper procedure.

Filing Reason

The demolition notice was issued without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the demolition notice under Section 52 of the MRTP Act without prior hearing is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the demolition notice was issued without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents argued that the notice was valid and in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi

Before issuing a demolition notice under Section 52 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, the authority must give the affected party an opportunity of hearing, as principles of natural justice require that no adverse action be taken without hearing the person likely to be affected.

Judgment Excerpts

The demolition notice was issued without giving any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The principles of natural justice require that before any adverse action is taken, the person likely to be affected must be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging a demolition notice issued by the Municipal Council, Kinwat. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 24 January 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: Section 52
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice under MRTP Act. Demolition Notice Quashed as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Remits Land Acquisition Compensation Matter for Reconsideration Due to Similarity with Earlier Remanded Cases. The appellant, a power transmission corporation, challenged the Reference Court's award enhancing compensation, but...