Search Results for "Auction Sale Notice"

978 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 978 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Port Trust for Recovery of Port Charges Due to Failure to Prove Auction Sale Date. Claim for Rs.1,14,057 Barred by Limitation as Evidence of Sale on 14th September 1981 was Inconsistent and Not Supported by Notice.

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, constituted under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,14,057.24 with inter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Cancellation of Site Allotment in APMC Auction for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Highest Bid Confirmed and Payment Accepted, Yet Allotment Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice — Held Unlawful.

The petitioner, M/s. Rakesh Traders, a licensed trader in APMC, Mysore, was originally allotted site No.369 in 'A' block of the APMC Yard under a leas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Execution of Consent Decree for Sale of Property Through Court in Partition Suit. Court Directs Issuance of Warrant of Sale and Appointment of Commissioner to Distribute Proceeds Equally Between Co-Owners.

The plaintiff, Shri Anant Narayan Kajrolkar, filed a praecipe in a pending execution application seeking production of papers and proceedings to enabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Suit — Limitation Period for Challenge to Auction Sale Under Article 137 of Limitation Act Is Three Years from Date of Sale Confirmation

The appellant, R Venkatapathy, filed a suit (O.S. No. 8639/2006) before the City Civil Court, Bangalore, challenging the auction sale of property cond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment and Sale of Residential Bungalow in Income Tax Recovery Proceedings. Order Beyond Limitation Period Under Rule 68B(3) of Second Schedule and Non-Compliance with Proclamation Requirements Render Sale Invalid.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the attachment and proposed sale of a residential bungalo...