Bombay High Court Dismisses Auction Purchaser's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor of Co-operative Housing Society. The Court held that the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 has jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance despite pending civil suit challenging auction sale, as the society's right to conveyance is independent of the auction purchaser's title.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ravi Jagganath Agarwal, an auction purchaser of land and building from the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai (MCGM) due to property tax defaults by the original landowners, challenged an order dated 15 February 2024 passed by the Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, granting unilateral deemed conveyance of the land in favor of Respondent No.1, Prince Tower Co-operative Housing Society Limited. The petitioner contended that the deemed conveyance would render his auction purchase futile, that a civil suit filed by the society challenging the auction sale was pending, and that his eviction proceedings under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 would be rendered infructuous. The facts revealed that the land was originally owned by Manilal Maneklal Parekh, transferred to M/s. Chandrakant & Co., which agreed to sell to M/s. Prince Enterprises. The developer entered into agreements with tenants and flat purchasers, and the building was completed with occupancy certificates in 1998 and 2002. The society was formed by flat owners. Due to property tax arrears, MCGM auctioned the land and building, and the petitioner purchased it. The society applied for deemed conveyance under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 (MOFA). The Competent Authority allowed the application. The court analyzed the jurisdiction of the Competent Authority under Section 11 of MOFA, which empowers it to order conveyance of land to a society even if the developer fails to do so. The court held that the authority's power is not affected by the auction sale or pending civil suit, as the society's right to conveyance arises from the agreements with the developer and the occupation of flats. The court also noted that the petitioner's eviction proceedings under the Rent Act would not be affected as the society becomes the landlord. The court dismissed the petition, upholding the order of deemed conveyance.

Headnote

A) Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act - Deemed Conveyance - Jurisdiction of Competent Authority - The Competent Authority under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 has the power to order deemed conveyance of land in favor of a co-operative housing society even if the land has been sold by auction by the municipal corporation for recovery of property tax dues. The authority's jurisdiction is not ousted by the pendency of a civil suit challenging the auction sale. (Paras 1-24)

B) Civil Procedure Code - Pending Suit - Effect on Statutory Proceedings - The pendency of a civil suit challenging the auction sale does not bar the Competent Authority from passing an order of deemed conveyance under the MOFA, 1963, as the statutory scheme for conveyance is independent of the civil dispute regarding title. The order of deemed conveyance does not amount to decreeing the suit. (Paras 1-24)

C) Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Eviction Proceedings - Impact of Deemed Conveyance - The order of deemed conveyance in favor of the society does not render the auction purchaser's eviction proceedings under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 infructuous, as the society becomes the landlord and the auction purchaser's rights as a purchaser are subject to the society's rights. (Paras 1-24)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 can grant deemed conveyance of land in favor of a co-operative housing society when the land has been purchased by an auction purchaser from the municipal corporation, and whether such order is valid despite a pending civil suit challenging the auction sale.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the order of deemed conveyance dated 15 February 2024 passed by the Competent Authority.

Law Points

  • Deemed conveyance under MOFA
  • 1963
  • Jurisdiction of Competent Authority
  • Effect of pending civil suit
  • Rights of auction purchaser vs. society
  • Maharashtra Rent Control Act
  • 1999
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (04) 86

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 8735 OF 2024

2024-04-08

SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

2024:BHC-OS:5895

Mr. Bhavek Manek with Mr. Chetan Jaiswal & Mr. Vinay D. Taliwal for Petitioner; Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sheetal Shah i/b Mehta & Girdharlal for Respondent No.1; Mr. Manish Upadhye AGP for State, Respondent No.3; Mr. Sagar Patil for MCGM, Respondent No.4; Ms. Nupur Desai i/b Markhand Gandhi & Co. for Respondent No.6

Ravi Jagganath Agarwal

Prince Tower Co-operative Housing Society Limited and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging order of deemed conveyance under MOFA, 1963

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of order dated 15 February 2024 granting deemed conveyance in favor of Respondent No.1-Society

Filing Reason

Petitioner, an auction purchaser of land and building from MCGM, challenged the order of deemed conveyance on grounds that it would render his purchase futile, that a civil suit challenging the auction was pending, and that his eviction proceedings under the Rent Act would be infructuous

Previous Decisions

Competent Authority passed order dated 15 February 2024 granting unilateral deemed conveyance in favor of Respondent No.1-Society

Issues

Whether the Competent Authority under MOFA, 1963 has jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance despite the land being sold by auction by MCGM? Whether the pendency of a civil suit challenging the auction sale bars the Competent Authority from passing an order of deemed conveyance? Whether the order of deemed conveyance renders the petitioner's eviction proceedings under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 infructuous?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the deemed conveyance would render his auction purchase futile, that the civil suit challenging the auction was pending, and that his eviction proceedings under the Rent Act would be infructuous. Respondent-Society argued that the Competent Authority has jurisdiction under MOFA to grant deemed conveyance and that the society's right to conveyance is independent of the auction sale.

Ratio Decidendi

The Competent Authority under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963 has the jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance of land in favor of a co-operative housing society even if the land has been sold by auction by the municipal corporation for recovery of property tax dues. The pendency of a civil suit challenging the auction sale does not oust the authority's jurisdiction, as the society's right to conveyance arises from the agreements with the developer and occupation of flats, independent of the auction purchaser's title. The order of deemed conveyance does not render eviction proceedings under the Rent Act infructuous, as the society becomes the landlord.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, Petitioner challenges Order dated 15 February 2024 passed by the Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies-(2), East Suburban, Mumbai granting unilateral deemed conveyance of land in favour of Respondent No.1-Society. Facts of the case, in brief, are that a tenanted structure stood on a plot of land, which was earlier owned by Mr. Manilal Maneklal Parekh, who transferred the plot in favour of M/s. Chandrakant & Co.

Procedural History

The Competent Authority passed an order dated 15 February 2024 granting deemed conveyance in favor of Respondent No.1-Society. The petitioner filed the present writ petition challenging that order. The petition was reserved on 26 March 2024 and pronounced on 8 April 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963: Section 11
  • Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Caste Certificate Fraud Case — Caste Claim Validated by Scrutiny Committee. No Prima Facie Case for Offences Under Sections 468, 193 IPC and Sections 10, 11 of Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000 as Applicant's ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of Charitable Trust Against Rejection of Approval Under Section 10(23C)(vi) of Income Tax Act — Trust Carrying on Educational Activities Not for Profit. Application of Income for Objects of Trust and Abs...