Karnataka High Court Quashes Cancellation of Site Allotment in APMC Auction for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Highest Bid Confirmed and Payment Accepted, Yet Allotment Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice — Held Unlawful.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Rakesh Traders, a licensed trader in APMC, Mysore, was originally allotted site No.369 in 'A' block of the APMC Yard under a lease-cum-sale agreement dated 05.07.2007. Subsequently, the APMC issued a notification on 18.08.2012 for auction of corner sites by way of lease-cum-sale. The petitioner applied on 07.09.2012 with earnest money deposit and participated in the public auction held on 10.09.2012 for site No.261 in Block 'A'. The petitioner emerged as the highest bidder with a bid amount of Rs.47,50,000/-. This was confirmed by a communication dated 13.09.2012 (Annexure-F), which called upon the petitioner to pay the balance amount of Rs.11,20,900/- within seven days. The petitioner deposited the said amount. However, the third respondent, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, issued a notice dated 21.08.2014 (Annexure-L) cancelling the allotment of the corner site to the petitioner. The petitioner challenged this cancellation by way of a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The court found that the impugned notice of cancellation was issued without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and no reasons were assigned for the cancellation. The court held that such cancellation without affording an opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The court quashed the impugned notice and directed the respondents to restore the allotment in favour of the petitioner and to execute the lease-cum-sale agreement in respect of the site in question within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Principles of Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Cancellation of Allotment - The Agricultural Produce Market Committee cancelled the allotment of a corner site to the petitioner without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing, despite the petitioner being the highest bidder and having paid the required amount. The court held that such cancellation without notice is arbitrary and violative of natural justice. (Paras 1-5)

B) Contract Law - Lease-cum-Sale Agreement - Cancellation - The petitioner had been allotted a site under a lease-cum-sale agreement and later successfully bid for a corner site in a public auction. The cancellation of the allotment without any prior notice or opportunity to show cause was set aside as illegal. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of allotment of a corner site to the petitioner by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee without issuing a show cause notice or affording an opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned notice of cancellation dated 21.08.2014 (Annexure-L) is quashed. The respondents are directed to restore the allotment in favour of the petitioner and to execute the lease-cum-sale agreement in respect of the site in question within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Audi alteram partem
  • Cancellation of allotment without notice is arbitrary
  • Lease-cum-sale agreement
  • Public auction
  • Highest bidder rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (11) 10

W.P.No. 43595/2014 (APMC)

2014-11-03

B.S.Patil

M V Ramesh Jois (for petitioner), H.V.Manjunatha (AGA for R1 & R2), T.Swaroop (for R3)

M/s. Rakesh Traders

Government of Karnataka, Director of Agricultural Marketing, Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Bandipalya

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging cancellation of allotment of a corner site in APMC yard.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned notice of cancellation dated 21.08.2014 and restoration of allotment.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's allotment of a corner site was cancelled without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of allotment without show cause notice is arbitrary and violative of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the cancellation was without notice and opportunity of hearing, and no reasons were assigned. Respondents did not file any statement of objections.

Ratio Decidendi

Cancellation of an allotment without issuing a show cause notice or affording an opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The court must interfere to prevent such arbitrary action.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned notice of cancellation has been issued without any show cause notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. No reasons are assigned for the cancellation. The action of the third respondent in cancelling the allotment without notice is arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the notice of cancellation dated 21.08.2014 issued by the third respondent. The petition came up for preliminary hearing and was disposed of on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Setting Aside of Discharge in Forgery Case — Complainant's Right to Lead Evidence Before Charge Not Extinguished by Filing Discharge Application. The court held that discharge under Section 245 CrPC cann...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination of Temporary Employee for Suppression of Criminal Case. Attestation Form Filled by Friend with False Information Justifies Discharge from Service.